Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Statistical analysis of method comparison data. Testing normality.

G S Cembrowski, J O Westgard, W J Conover

    American Journal of Clinical Pathology
    |July 1, 1979
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Low sensitivity of anion gap to detect clinically significant lactic acidosis in the emergency department.

    Clinical biochemistry·2017
    Same author

    Combination therapy with a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor and a proton pump inhibitor restores normoglycaemia in non-obese diabetic mice.

    Diabetologia·2009
    Same author

    Identifying variables associated with inaccurate self-monitoring of blood glucose: proposed guidelines to improve accuracy.

    The Diabetes educator·2002
    Same author

    Models for combining random and systematic errors. assumptions and consequences for different models.

    Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine·2001
    Same author

    Fructosamine, III: Prologue or epitaph?

    Diabetes technology & therapeutics·2001
    Same author

    Electronic quality control, the total testing process, and the total quality control system.

    Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry·2001
    Same journal

    Invasive urothelial carcinoma in association with surface low-grade papillary urothelial carcinoma: clinical and pathologic insights from a rare entity.

    American journal of clinical pathology·2026
    Same journal

    CEACAM1 expression by immunohistochemistry in B-cell lymphomas and plasma cell myeloma.

    American journal of clinical pathology·2026
    Same journal

    Comprehensive multicriteria life cycle assessment of biopsy processing in a surgical pathology department.

    American journal of clinical pathology·2026
    Same journal

    Prognostic significance of Myb protein and its downstream target genes in lacrimal gland adenoid cystic carcinoma.

    American journal of clinical pathology·2026
    Same journal

    Mismatch repair protein "nonclassic expression loss" pattern in colorectal cancer: an important staining pattern that is not well understood.

    American journal of clinical pathology·2026
    Same journal

    Musculoskeletal pain in medical laboratory personnel: a cross-sectional study.

    American journal of clinical pathology·2026
    See all related articles

    The Lilliefors test for normality is overly sensitive to typical clinical chemistry data, often incorrectly flagging it as non-normal. Modifications can improve its accuracy for rounded data, ensuring appropriate statistical method selection.

    Area of Science:

    • Clinical Chemistry
    • Biostatistics
    • Statistical Methods

    Background:

    • Normality testing is crucial for selecting appropriate statistical methods in scientific research.
    • The Lilliefors test is commonly used but may be sensitive to data characteristics in specific fields.
    • Method performance studies in clinical chemistry often involve rounded, narrowly distributed data.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To evaluate the performance of the Lilliefors test of normality on data from precision and accuracy studies.
    • To investigate the sensitivity of the Lilliefors test to rounded data typical in clinical chemistry.
    • To explore modifications of the Lilliefors test for improved applicability to such data.

    Main Methods:

    • Application of the Lilliefors test to datasets from precision and accuracy studies.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Conducting simulation studies to assess the test's behavior with rounded, narrowly distributed data.
  • Developing and evaluating a modified Lilliefors test for rounded data.

    • Main Results:

    • Most tested data sets were identified as non-normal by the standard Lilliefors test.
    • Simulation studies confirmed the test's high sensitivity to rounded data, leading to frequent non-normality indications.
    • A modified Lilliefors test demonstrated fewer indications of non-normality for rounded data.

    Conclusions:

    • The standard Lilliefors test is often inappropriate for typical clinical chemistry data due to its sensitivity.
    • Modifications to the Lilliefors test can enhance its reliability for analyzing rounded data.
    • Careful consideration of test properties is essential for selecting appropriate normality tests and subsequent statistical analyses.