Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Evolution of an examination: M.R.C.P. (U.K.).

P R Fleming, W G Manderson, M B Matthews

    British Medical Journal
    |April 13, 1974
    PubMed
    Summary

    Recent updates to the Membership of the Royal Colleges of Physicians (MRCP) (UK) examination structure enhance its effectiveness. Part I

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    The action of noradrenaline in man and its relation to pheochromocytoma and hypertension.

    Clinical science·2014
    Same author

    The haemodynamic significance of intrapulmonary septal lymphatic lines (lines B of Kerley).

    The Journal of the Faculty of Radiologists. Faculty of Radiologists (Great Britain)·2014
    Same author

    The preregistration year: need for a national survey.

    Medical teacher·2014
    Same author

    Hand-Schüller-Christian syndrome.

    Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine·2010
    Same author

    The conus medullaris syndrome in spinal contusion.

    British medical journal·2010
    Same author

    Angina pectoris and tobacco.

    Clinical science·2010

    Area of Science:

    • Medical education and assessment
    • Physician training and certification

    Background:

    • The Membership of the Royal Colleges of Physicians (MRCP) (UK) examination has undergone structural revisions.
    • Historical context of examinations from the Royal Colleges of Physicians in Edinburgh, Glasgow, and London is reviewed.

    Observation:

    • Part I of the examination serves as a crucial screening tool.
    • Minor adjustments to the marking system in Part I have reportedly enhanced its discriminatory power.

    Findings:

    • The primary modification in Part II involves replacing traditional essay papers with a more objective written test.
    • This change aims to improve the assessment's objectivity and reliability.

    Implications:

    • The revised examination structure may lead to more effective evaluation of candidates' knowledge and skills.
    • These changes reflect an ongoing effort to refine medical certification processes.
    • Enhanced assessment methods can better prepare physicians for clinical practice.

    Related Experiment Videos