Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Contrast sensitivity functions for clinical optometry.

J P Comerford

    Journal of the American Optometric Association
    |June 1, 1979
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Visual field defects detected in patients with Gilles de la Tourette syndrome: preliminary report.

    International ophthalmology·1989
    Same author

    Effect of luminance level on contrast sensitivity in myopia.

    American journal of optometry and physiological optics·1987
    Same author

    High myopia does not affect contrast sensitivity.

    Current eye research·1986
    Same author

    Vision evaluation using contrast sensitivity functions.

    American journal of optometry and physiological optics·1983
    Same author

    Use of various measures of visual acuity and contrast sensitivity in the evaluation of monocular occlusion and active vision training of three adult amblyopes.

    American journal of optometry and physiological optics·1983
    Same author

    Flicker photometry of equally bright lights.

    Vision research·1975
    Same journal

    Visual skills profiles.

    Journal of the American Optometric Association·2014
    Same journal

    Dark adaptation and night blindness.

    Journal of the American Optometric Association·2014
    Same journal

    Scleral tonometry.

    Journal of the American Optometric Association·2014
    Same journal

    Staying in shape: the different roads to fitness for busy optometrists.

    Journal of the American Optometric Association·2000
    Same journal

    Hiring a new optometrist? Be prepared!

    Journal of the American Optometric Association·2000
    Same journal

    Late traumatic intraocular lens extrusion after penetrating keratoplasty.

    Journal of the American Optometric Association·2000
    See all related articles

    Contrast sensitivity functions (CSF) offer a superior assessment of visual function compared to standard acuity tests. Arden plates are recommended as the optimal clinical tool for determining CSFs in various patient groups.

    Area of Science:

    • Ophthalmology
    • Optometry
    • Visual Science

    Background:

    • Traditional visual acuity tests have limitations in assessing overall visual function.
    • Contrast sensitivity is a crucial aspect of visual performance, particularly in low light or with visual impairments.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To highlight the importance of contrast sensitivity functions (CSF) over traditional acuity tests.
    • To discuss the application of CSFs in diagnosing and monitoring various ocular conditions.
    • To evaluate different methods for CSF measurement and recommend the most suitable for clinical use.

    Main Methods:

    • Review of existing literature on contrast sensitivity testing.
    • Discussion of the clinical utility of CSFs in patient populations including those with cataracts, contact lens wearers, glaucoma, and retrobulbar neuritis.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Evaluation of various techniques for measuring CSF.

    • Main Results:

    • Contrast sensitivity functions (CSF) provide a more comprehensive measure of visual function than standard acuity tests.
    • CSFs are valuable in assessing patients with conditions like cataracts, glaucoma, and retrobulbar neuritis.
    • The newly developed Arden plates demonstrate superiority for clinical CSF determination.

    Conclusions:

    • Contrast sensitivity functions (CSF) are essential for a thorough evaluation of visual performance.
    • Arden plates represent the most effective method for clinical contrast sensitivity testing.
    • Implementing CSF testing can improve patient management in ophthalmology and optometry.