Evaluation of albumin use by medical audit

The appropriateness of albumin prescribing and accuracy of records of albumin use were studied at a 476-bed hospital. Medical records of 15 adults who had undergone surgery within one week of albumin administration were compared with eight prescribing and charting criteria that were developed by pharmacists. Charts of patients who did not meet every criteria were reviewed by a committee to determine if exceptions to the criteria were justifiable. Albumin prescribing was empirical for approximately 60% of the patients. Albumin use as judged by laboratory values was inappropriate in three patients. Charting of the amount and rate of albumin administered was inaccurate, incomplete or difficult to interpret for eight (53%) of the patients. The dosage of albumin prescribed was inappropriate for two (13%) patients. Appropriate concomitant therapy (e.g., packed red blood cells) was not prescribed for two patients. For only three patients did the patient's charge correspond to the amount charted as being administered. On an annual basis, patient charges for albumin were projected to be $9,321 less than the hospital's cost for the product. The audit identified problems in albumin prescribing and charting that, when corrected, would result in cost savings and improved patient care.