Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Measurement of thinking dysfunction. An empirical study.

T B Karasu, R Plutchik, P Nemetz

    The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease
    |November 1, 1979
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Reflections.

    Journal of general internal medicine·2016
    Same author

    The measurement of emotions.

    Acta neuropsychiatrica·2016
    Same author

    Estimating means and variances: The comparative efficiency of composite and grab samples.

    Environmental monitoring and assessment·2013
    Same author

    The worst of times, the best of times : psychotherapy in the 1990s.

    The Journal of psychotherapy practice and research·2012
    Same author

    Strategies of therapist interventions : a preliminary empirical study.

    The Journal of psychotherapy practice and research·2012
    Same author

    Determinants of outpatients' satisfaction with therapists : relation to outcome.

    The Journal of psychotherapy practice and research·2012
    Same journal

    Efficacy and Safety of Aripiprazole in Children and Adolescents With Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Meta-Analysis.

    The Journal of nervous and mental disease·2026
    Same journal

    Metacognitive Interpersonal Group Therapy for Adolescents With Personality Disorders: Results From the METAMIND-A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

    The Journal of nervous and mental disease·2026
    Same journal

    Activation Syndrome in Patients Diagnosed With Major Depressive Disorder for the First Time: The Role of Past Hypomania Symptoms and Atypical Depression as Risk Factors.

    The Journal of nervous and mental disease·2026
    Same journal

    Predicting Social Motivation and Interactions in Schizophrenia: An Ecological Momentary Assessment Study.

    The Journal of nervous and mental disease·2026
    Same journal

    Use of EQUATOR Network Templates in JNMD: The STROBE Guideline for Observational Studies.

    The Journal of nervous and mental disease·2026
    Same journal

    Mental Illness Attributions and Their Association With Psychotherapy Change Process Expectations.

    The Journal of nervous and mental disease·2026
    See all related articles

    This study developed the Thinking Dysfunction Rating Scale to assess thought disorders. The scale achieved high interjudge agreement and effectively differentiated between various patient groups.

    Area of Science:

    • Psychiatry
    • Clinical Psychology
    • Psychopathology

    Background:

    • Thought disorders are complex, with numerous terms used in literature.
    • Existing terminology for thought disorders often lacks clear operational definitions.
    • A standardized assessment method is needed for clinical and research purposes.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To develop a practical and reliable method for assessing thought disorders.
    • To create an operationally defined scale for evaluating thought disorder components.
    • To validate the scale's utility in differentiating patient populations.

    Main Methods:

    • Literature review to identify and consolidate terms for thought disorders.
    • Expert survey of psychiatrists to refine operational definitions.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Application of the developed Thinking Dysfunction Rating Scale to videotaped patient interviews.
  • Statistical analysis, including interjudge agreement and analysis of variance.

    • Main Results:

    • Reduced 37 terms to 17 discrete, operationally defined terms.
    • Achieved 83% agreement among psychiatrists on definitions, leading to modifications.
    • Demonstrated over 90% interjudge agreement on the Thinking Dysfunction Rating Scale.
    • Scale significantly discriminated between schizophrenics, organic brain syndromes, psychotic depressives, geriatric depressives, and outpatients.

    Conclusions:

    • The Thinking Dysfunction Rating Scale is a reliable tool for assessing thought disorders.
    • The scale effectively differentiates between various psychiatric and neurological conditions.
    • This scale can be valuable for clinical diagnosis and educational purposes in psychiatry.