Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 16, 2026

Antibiotic Efficacy Testing in an Ex vivo Model of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus Biofilms in the Cystic Fibrosis Lung
Published on: January 22, 2021
In-vitro activities of cefamandole and cephalothin against 1,881 clinical isolates. A multi-center study
Abstract:
By use of an agardilution technic, 1,881 clinical isolates were tested against cefamandole and cephalothin. The isolates represented 18 genera, recovered in five geographically separate centers within the United States. The majority of strains were susceptible (MICs less than or equal to 8 micrograms/ml) to both drugs. Cefamandole showed greater activity against most of the bacterial pathogens. Enterococci, Serratia spp., and Acinetobacter spp. were resistant to both drugs. Cephalothin was more active against Staphylococcus aureus, and both cephalosporins were relatively inactive against methicillin-resistant strains of S. aureus. Enterobacter spp. and indole-positive Proteus spp. were susceptible to cefamandole but resistant to cephalothin.
Insights
Cefamandole demonstrated superior activity against most bacterial pathogens compared to cephalothin, though both antibiotics were ineffective against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains. Certain bacteria like Enterococci and Serratia spp. showed resistance to both drugs.
Area of Science:
- Microbiology
- Infectious Diseases
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Antibiotic resistance is a growing global health concern.
- Cephalosporins are a class of beta-lactam antibiotics widely used to treat bacterial infections.
- Evaluating the efficacy of existing antibiotics against contemporary clinical isolates is crucial.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the in vitro activity of cefamandole and cephalothin against a large collection of clinical bacterial isolates.
- To identify bacterial pathogens susceptible or resistant to these two cephalosporins.
Main Methods:
- Agar dilution technique was employed for antimicrobial susceptibility testing.
- 1,881 clinical isolates from 18 bacterial genera were tested.
- Isolates were collected from five geographically distinct centers in the United States.
Main Results:
- The majority of bacterial isolates were susceptible to both cefamandole and cephalothin (MIC ≤ 8 µg/ml).
- Cefamandole exhibited greater antimicrobial activity against most tested bacterial pathogens.
- Enterococci, Serratia spp., and Acinetobacter spp. were resistant to both antibiotics.
- Cephalothin showed higher activity against Staphylococcus aureus.
- Both cephalosporins were largely inactive against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA).
- Enterobacter spp. and indole-positive Proteus spp. were susceptible to cefamandole but resistant to cephalothin.
Conclusions:
- Cefamandole generally possesses broader in vitro activity than cephalothin against a diverse range of clinical bacterial isolates.
- Neither cefamandole nor cephalothin are effective against MRSA.
- Specific bacterial genera exhibit differential susceptibility patterns to cefamandole and cephalothin, informing empirical treatment choices.
Related Concept Videos
Pharmaceutical Alternatives: Stability-Related Therapeutic Nonequivalence
Urine Studies II: Urine Culture and Sensitivity Test
Antimicrobial Effectiveness
Mechanism of Antibiotic Resistance in MRSA
Clinical Significance of Antibiotic Resistance

