Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Forgetting: trace erosion or retrieval failure?

R M Shiffrin

    Science (New York, N.Y.)
    |June 26, 1970
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Forgetting is not due to memory degradation over time. Instead, memory retrieval failures during search processes impact recall probability, influencing how words are remembered.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    An expectancy model for memory search.

    Memory & cognition·2013
    Same author

    A model for recognition memory: REM-retrieving effectively from memory.

    Psychonomic bulletin & review·2011
    Same author

    Retrieval processes in recognition and cued recall.

    Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2001
    Same author

    An ARC-REM model for accuracy and response time in recognition and recall.

    Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2001
    Same author

    Perceptual inertia: spatial attention and warning foreperiod?

    Psychological research·2001
    Same author

    Perception and preference in short-term word priming.

    Psychological review·2001
    Same journal

    Erratum for the Research Article "Detecting supramolecular organic nanoparticles during heat wave".

    Science (New York, N.Y.)·2026
    Same journal

    Local signals, systemic decline.

    Science (New York, N.Y.)·2026
    Same journal

    The mechanics of liver regeneration.

    Science (New York, N.Y.)·2026
    Same journal

    Computing in a memory with physics.

    Science (New York, N.Y.)·2026
    Same journal

    Retraction.

    Science (New York, N.Y.)·2026
    Same journal

    Making time.

    Science (New York, N.Y.)·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Cognitive Psychology
    • Human Memory Studies

    Background:

    • Understanding the mechanisms of forgetting is crucial for cognitive science.
    • Previous theories debated whether forgetting results from memory trace decay or retrieval failure.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate the primary cause of forgetting: memory trace degradation or retrieval failure.
    • To determine how list length and intervening lists affect word recall probability.

    Main Methods:

    • Participants were presented with sequential lists of random words.
    • Subjects attempted to recall words from a list presented immediately before the most recent list.
    • Recall probability was analyzed in relation to the length of the word list and the number of intervening lists.

    Main Results:

    Related Experiment Videos

    • Recall probability was significantly influenced by the length of the list in which a word was originally embedded.
    • The length of the intervening list between presentation and recall did not affect recall probability.
    • This suggests that memory search efficiency, not time-based decay, is key to recall.

    Conclusions:

    • Forgetting is primarily a failure of memory search during the retrieval process.
    • Memory traces do not significantly degrade between presentation and testing phases.
    • Effective memory retrieval depends on efficient search strategies rather than the passive passage of time.