Related Experiment Videos
Circulation policies in health science libraries
Bulletin of the Medical Library Association
|October 1, 1970
Summary
Library policies significantly impact usage. Larger medical libraries with more resources often have stricter, differentiated policies for faculty and students compared to smaller institutions.
Area of Science:
- Health Sciences Librarianship
- Academic Library Administration
- Information Science
Background:
- Library policies are recognized as influential factors in library utilization.
- Medical school libraries play a crucial role in supporting health science education and research.
Purpose of the Study:
- To survey medical school libraries regarding their policies affecting faculty and student use.
- To investigate the relationship between library size/resources and policy restrictiveness.
Main Methods:
- Survey of medical school libraries across the country.
- Categorization of libraries into high, middle, and low groups based on size (student body, faculty, holdings, staff), budget, and circulation.
- Analysis of policies concerning faculty/student use, circulation, hours, reserve materials, interlibrary loans, overdue materials, and exit control.
Main Results:
- Libraries in the high category (larger size, budget, circulation) exhibited more restrictive policies.
- High-category libraries were more likely to have separate regulations for faculty and students compared to low-category libraries.
- Significant differences in policy approaches were observed between high and low-category institutions.
Conclusions:
- Institutional size and resource allocation correlate with library policy restrictiveness in medical schools.
- Larger, better-resourced medical libraries tend to implement more differentiated and stringent policies.
- Further research is warranted to explore the implications of these policy variations.