Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Colposcopy or cervical conization? An economic comparison.

J M Austin, E D Charles, H M Shingleton

    Southern Medical Journal
    |May 1, 1978
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Development and Psychometric Analysis of a Patient-Reported Measure of Diagnostic Excellence for Emergency and Urgent Care Settings.

    Journal of patient safety·2024
    Same author

    Freestream velocity-profile measurement in a large-scale, high-enthalpy reflected-shock tunnel.

    Experiments in fluids·2021
    Same author

    Genome-wide association study of hepatitis C virus- and cryoglobulin-related vasculitis.

    Genes and immunity·2014
    Same author

    Trends in invasive disease due to Candida species following heart and lung transplantation.

    Transplant infectious disease : an official journal of the Transplantation Society·2009
    Same author

    Intraperitoneal radioimmunochemotherapy of ovarian cancer: a phase I study.

    Cancer biotherapy & radiopharmaceuticals·2001
    Same author

    The Society of Gynecologic Oncologists Outcomes Task Force. Study of endometrical cancer: initial experiences.

    Gynecologic oncology·2000
    Same journal

    SMA's 6th Annual Physicians-in-Training Leadership Conference Abstract Presentations.

    Southern medical journal·2026
    Same journal

    Potential Impact of Lower Federal Loan Availability on Medical Education in Appalachia.

    Southern medical journal·2026
    Same journal

    Experiential Mentorship Skills Training: The Effect on Real-Life Mentoring.

    Southern medical journal·2026
    Same journal

    Social Pressure: How Early Social Context Shapes Career Interest in Medicine.

    Southern medical journal·2026
    Same journal

    Comparing Speed and Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence Large Language Models on the Orthopedic In-Training Examination.

    Southern medical journal·2026
    Same journal

    Don't Wait to Talk about Weight: A 2-Hour Interactive Curriculum Improves Medical Student Skills with Weight Management.

    Southern medical journal·2026
    See all related articles

    Colposcopic evaluation for abnormal Pap smears is significantly more cost-effective than conization. This approach offers substantial savings, especially when preceding hysterectomy, improving patient care economics.

    Area of Science:

    • Gynecologic oncology
    • Cost-effectiveness analysis
    • Cervical cancer screening

    Background:

    • Abnormal Papanicolaou (Pap) smears necessitate further diagnostic evaluation.
    • Current diagnostic pathways include colposcopy and cervical conization.
    • The financial implications of these diagnostic methods require careful consideration.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To compare the costs associated with colposcopic evaluation versus cervical conization for abnormal Pap smears.
    • To assess the potential cost savings of using colposcopy as a primary diagnostic tool.

    Main Methods:

    • Comparative cost analysis of two diagnostic procedures.
    • Evaluation of costs for colposcopic examination.
    • Evaluation of costs for cervical conization.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • Average cost of colposcopic evaluation: $106.
    • Average cost of conization: $923.70.
    • Significant cost reduction observed when colposcopy precedes hysterectomy compared to conization.

    Conclusions:

    • Colposcopic evaluation is a more cost-effective strategy than conization for patients with abnormal Pap smears.
    • Implementing colposcopy as the initial diagnostic step can lead to substantial healthcare savings.
    • Ensuring adequate colposcopic examination and tissue diagnosis is crucial for accurate comparison and patient management.