Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Olfactory testing: rules for odor identification.

W S Cain, R J Krause

    Neurological Research
    |January 1, 1979
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Simple smell tests can be improved for accurate olfactory assessment. New methods using familiar scents and bridging the odor-name gap significantly enhance performance in individuals with normal olfaction.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Nature of perceived effort and fatigue.

    Journal of motor behavior·2013
    Same author

    Constant effort during static and dynamic muscular exercise.

    Journal of motor behavior·2013
    Same author

    Ventilation rates and health: multidisciplinary review of the scientific literature.

    Indoor air·2011
    Same author

    A quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) for a draize eye irritation database.

    Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA·2010
    Same author

    Draize Eye Scores and Eye Irritation Thresholds in Man Combined into one Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship.

    Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA·2010
    Same author

    Olfactory detection of ozone and D-limonene: reactants in indoor spaces.

    Indoor air·2007
    Same journal

    Diffusion tensor imaging parameters in the presence of optic neuritis in multiple sclerosis.

    Neurological research·2026
    Same journal

    Does early gastrostomy tube placement after stroke improve functional recovery and quality of life? A literature-informed pathway-decomposition analysis.

    Neurological research·2026
    Same journal

    Predictive ability of cardiac biomarkers for early risk stratification and 3-month functional outcomes after reperfusion therapy in acute ischemic stroke.

    Neurological research·2026
    Same journal

    Luteolin reduces sciatic nerve damage and modulates TRPV1 and TRPM2 expression in diabetic rats.

    Neurological research·2026
    Same journal

    Cholinergic regulation of memory retrieval: scopolamine reduces hippocampal neurotrophic and metabolic support.

    Neurological research·2026
    Same journal

    Effect of intravenous thrombolysis on arterial and venous profiles in large-vessel occlusion stroke: a retrospective propensity score-matched study.

    Neurological research·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Neuroscience
    • Sensory Science
    • Clinical Assessment

    Background:

    • Standard neurology recommendations for olfactory assessment involve odor identification.
    • However, even individuals with normal olfaction (normosmics) frequently exhibit poor performance on these tests.
    • This ambiguity in results complicates accurate diagnosis and evaluation of olfactory function.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate methods for improving the accuracy of olfactory testing.
    • To address the olfactory-verbal gap that hinders accurate odor identification.
    • To explore alternative testing formats, such as scratch-and-sniff labels.

    Main Methods:

    • Three experiments were conducted to evaluate different olfactory testing procedures.
    • The study incorporated highly familiar substances to enhance recognition.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • A key focus was developing methods to circumvent the olfactory-verbal gap, linking odors directly to their names.
  • One experiment utilized a multiple-choice format.

    • Main Results:

    • A multiple-choice procedure resulted in 100% accuracy among normosmics.
    • An alternative method achieved 99% accuracy in normosmics and 0% in individuals with no sense of smell (anosmics).
    • The investigation suggests that scratch-and-sniff labels may be a viable alternative to traditional odorants.

    Conclusions:

    • Standard olfactory identification tests can be ambiguous, even for individuals with normal olfaction.
    • Modifying tests with familiar substances and addressing the olfactory-verbal gap dramatically improves accuracy.
    • Novel testing approaches show promise for more reliable clinical assessment of olfactory function.