Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Statistical bias in cross-sequential studies of aging.

J Adam

    Experimental Aging Research
    |July 1, 1977
    PubMed
    Summary

    Cross-sequential research designs in aging and intelligence studies contain statistical bias. This bias inflates cohort effects, potentially misinterpreting generational influences as developmental changes.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Evidence of Spin-Interference Effects in Exclusive J/ψ→e^{+}e^{-} Photoproduction in Ultraperipheral Heavy-Ion Collisions.

    Physical review letters·2026
    Same author

    First Observation of Deuteron-Λ Correlations at RHIC.

    Physical review letters·2026
    Same author

    Observation of Charmonium Sequential Suppression in Heavy-Ion Collisions at the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider.

    Physical review letters·2026
    Same author

    Energy Independence of the Collins Asymmetry in p^{↑}p Collisions.

    Physical review letters·2026
    Same author

    Precision Measurement of Net-Proton-Number Fluctuations in Au+Au Collisions at RHIC.

    Physical review letters·2025
    Same author

    Influence of blood glucose level on sow traits, farrowing characteristics and piglet parameters in free farrowing sows.

    Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience·2025

    Area of Science:

    • Gerontology
    • Developmental Psychology
    • Psychometrics

    Background:

    • Cross-sequential research designs are common in aging and intelligence studies.
    • Previous work suggested these designs may bias results, favoring cohort over time effects.
    • This bias could lead to misinterpretation of ontogenetic influences as generational.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To provide conclusive proof of the statistical bias in cross-sequential designs.
    • To demonstrate how the degree of bias escalates with the number of cohorts tested.
    • To offer an intuitive explanation of the statistical issue.

    Main Methods:

    • Statistical analysis of cross-sequential research designs.
    • Examination of the main effects F ratio for cohort versus time of measurement.
    • Analysis of bias as a function of the number of cohorts and measurement occasions.

    Main Results:

    • Conclusive statistical proof of inherent bias in cross-sequential designs was established.
    • The magnitude of bias increases with the number of distinct cohorts included.
    • Purely ontogenetic influences are demonstrably misinterpreted as generational effects.

    Conclusions:

    • Cross-sequential designs possess a statistically demonstrable bias.
    • This bias systematically overestimates cohort effects.
    • Researchers must be cautious when interpreting generational differences in aging and intelligence studies.

    Related Experiment Videos