Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 12, 2026

Quantifying Agonist Activity at G Protein-coupled Receptors
Published on: December 26, 2011
A comparative study of the activation of the cholinergic receptor by various agonists
Abstract:
At the frog neuromuscular junction, a dose-response curve for the activation of the nicotinic receptor by carbachol has been determined under conditions where desensitization could be estimated and corrected for. The value of the Hill coefficient was 2 and that of the dissociation constant for carbachol was 400 microM, the two binding sites of the receptor being assumed identical. The properties of six cholinergic agonists were then compared. the potencies and mean open times of these agonists are ranked in the same order, but the range of the potencies is much larger (1-200) than that of the mean open times (1-4). The differences in the properties of the different agonists could simply be due to differences in the rate of dissociation of the agonists, if it is assumed that one apparent opening of the channel is in fact a burst of several oscillations between the open and closed conformations, such that a burst is interrupted by the dissociation of one agonist molecule.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Cholinergic Receptors: Muscarinic
The subtypes M1, M3, and M5 couple with the Gq subunit and activate the phospholipase C (PLC) activity, mobilizing intracellular Ca2+. Activation...
Cholinergic Receptors: Nicotinic
There are two types of nicotinic receptors: neuromuscular (NM/NM/N1) and neuronal (NN/NN/N2). The two families differ based on their location and selectivity to...
Direct-Acting Cholinergic Agonists: Chemistry and Structure-Activity Relationship
The direct-acting...
Direct-Acting Cholinergic Agonists: Pharmacological Actions
Indirect-Acting Cholinergic Agonists: Chemistry and Structure-Activity Relationship
Reversible inhibitors display short to medium durations of action. Short-acting agents include simple alcohols with...
Cholinergic Antagonists: Chemistry and Structure-Activity Relationship

