Related Experiment Videos
The dependence potential of benzodiazepines
Current Medical Research and Opinion
|January 1, 1984
Summary
This study found that lorazepam, a benzodiazepine, was not a preferred reinforcer in human subjects, unlike other drugs. Higher doses of lorazepam were even less preferred than placebo.
Area of Science:
- Pharmacology
- Neuroscience
- Psychology
Background:
- Benzodiazepines are commonly prescribed but their potential for reinforcement and dependence is not fully understood.
- Previous research indicates diazepam, a benzodiazepine, is not an effective reinforcer in human subjects.
- Understanding benzodiazepine reinforcement properties is crucial for assessing abuse potential.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the reinforcing properties of lorazepam, a short-acting benzodiazepine, in adult human volunteers.
- To compare the reinforcing effects of lorazepam with placebo and diazepam.
- To evaluate the dose-dependent effects of lorazepam on drug preference.
Main Methods:
- A choice procedure was used with 12 healthy adult volunteers.
- Four experiments were conducted, comparing three doses of lorazepam (0.5, 1.0, 2.0 mg) against placebo.
- One experiment directly compared 1.0 mg lorazepam to 5.0 mg diazepam; subjective effects were also monitored.
Main Results:
- Subjects did not prefer 0.5 mg lorazepam over placebo.
- No preference was observed between 1.0 mg lorazepam and 5.0 mg diazepam.
- A clear preference for placebo over 1.0 mg and 2.0 mg lorazepam was found.
- Lorazepam produced expected anxiolytic and sedative effects, with a longer duration than anticipated (up to 6 hours).
Conclusions:
- Lorazepam does not appear to be an effective reinforcer in this experimental paradigm.
- The reinforcing potential of shorter-acting benzodiazepines remains to be determined due to lorazepam's prolonged effects.
- Further research is needed to fully elucidate the relationship between benzodiazepine pharmacokinetics and their reinforcing properties.