Related Experiment Videos
An assessment of a computerized reporting system (SIREP)
The British Journal of Radiology
|May 1, 1980
Summary
A computerized radiological reporting system (SIREP) was assessed. While mechanically reliable, it increased radiologist reporting time for abnormal cases, showing no overall cost or time benefit compared to traditional methods.
Area of Science:
- Radiology and Medical Imaging
- Health Informatics
- Human-Computer Interaction
Background:
- Traditional radiological reporting relies on manual methods.
- Assessing new technologies is crucial for improving efficiency in radiology departments.
- The Bristol Royal Infirmary implemented a computerized system to evaluate reporting processes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the prototype of a computerized radiological reporting system (SIREP).
- To assess the system's impact on reporting efficiency, departmental workflow, and radiologist acceptance.
- To determine the technical aspects, reliability, and overall benefit of the SIREP system.
Main Methods:
- A prototype computerized radiological reporting system (SIREP) was installed and evaluated.
- Radiologists interacted with a touch-sensitive screen displaying slides of relevant words and phrases.
- Reporting sequences and times were compared with conventional methods, focusing on normal versus abnormal cases.
Main Results:
- The SIREP system was mechanically reliable and fast, with a maximum slide transit time of three seconds.
- Secretaries could save an estimated 64 minutes of typing daily for 100 reports.
- Radiologists experienced a 63-minute increase in reporting time, particularly for abnormal findings, and found reporting abnormalities more effortful.
Conclusions:
- The SIREP system directly impacted radiologists and secretaries but offered no overall cost or time savings in the UK context.
- Radiologists found the system simple to operate but preferred traditional methods due to increased effort and time for abnormal case reporting.
- Further development is needed to realize the potential benefits of computerized reporting systems in clinical practice.