Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

What health sciences programs want from biomedical communications.

I R Merrill

    The Journal of Biocommunication
    |November 1, 1980
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Biomedical communications units and their parent organizations: a survey.

    The Journal of biocommunication·1978
    Same author

    Television in the operating suite and special areas.

    Anesthesiology·1969
    Same author

    The effectiveness of motion pictures at different stages of learning history-taking.

    Journal of medical education·1969
    Same author

    The effects of effort and reinforcement on retention and enjoyment of programmed instruction.

    Journal of medical education·1969
    Same author

    Effects of effort on retention and enjoyment.

    Journal of educational psychology·1968
    Same author

    Retention and enjoyment of medical training: the effect of effort.

    Journal of medical education·1966
    Same journal

    Kidney anatomy: A Survey of Historical Illustrations and Methods of Depiction.

    The Journal of biocommunication·2026
    Same journal

    Animating Metoidioplasty Anatomy for Urology Nursing Practice.

    The Journal of biocommunication·2026
    Same journal

    Publisher's Comment: JBC Volume 49, Number 2, 2025.

    The Journal of biocommunication·2026
    Same journal

    2025 AMI Professional Salon Award Recipients.

    The Journal of biocommunication·2025
    Same journal

    Publisher's Comment: JBC Volume 49, Number 1, 2025.

    The Journal of biocommunication·2025
    Same journal

    2025 BioImages Salon Award Winners.

    The Journal of biocommunication·2025
    See all related articles

    Biomedical communications service priorities vary significantly across different health professions, indicating a need for tailored unit models. Each unit should adapt its services to the specific programs it supports for optimal effectiveness.

    Area of Science:

    • Biomedical Communications
    • Health Sciences Education
    • Information Management

    Background:

    • Biomedical communications units provide essential support services to various health professional programs.
    • Understanding service priorities is crucial for optimizing resource allocation and effectiveness.
    • Previous research has not comprehensively addressed the differential service needs across diverse health disciplines.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To survey and analyze the perceived importance of eight key services offered by biomedical communications units.
    • To identify and report service priorities specific to medicine, allied health, dentistry, nursing, and pharmacy programs.
    • To determine if a "one-size-fits-all" model is appropriate for biomedical communications units.

    Main Methods:

    Related Experiment Videos

  • A survey was distributed to all active U.S. members of the Association of Biomedical Communications Directors in 1979.
  • Respondents ranked the importance of eight service types for each professional program their unit supported.
  • Data analysis focused on comparing service priorities across different health disciplines.

    • Main Results:

    • Service priorities were found to be distinct and program-specific across medicine, allied health, dentistry, nursing, and pharmacy.
    • No universal ranking of service importance emerged, highlighting interdisciplinary differences.
    • The relative importance of services varied depending on the professional program being supported.

    Conclusions:

    • The findings strongly suggest that a single, standardized model for biomedical communications units is not effective.
    • Biomedical communications units should be designed and adapted based on the unique needs of the specific health professional programs they serve.
    • Tailoring services to program requirements is essential for maximizing the impact and efficiency of biomedical communications support.