Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 9, 2026

Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asynchronous Heart Failure Model Induced by Left Bundle Branch Ablation and Rapid Pacing
Published on: December 11, 2017
Electrophysiologic studies in patients with bundle branch block
Insights
A prolonged infranodal conduction time (H-Q) in patients with chronic bundle branch block predicts atrioventricular block. Prophylactic pacing does not improve outcomes, but electrophysiologic studies are vital for syncope evaluation.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Electrophysiology
Background:
- Chronic bundle branch block (BBB) poses risks for atrioventricular (AV) block.
- Predictive markers for AV block progression in BBB are crucial for patient management.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the predictive value of infranodal conduction time (H-Q interval) for AV block in chronic BBB patients.
- To evaluate the efficacy of prophylactic pacemaker insertion and electrophysiologic studies in managing BBB complications.
Main Methods:
- Electrophysiologic studies were performed on 401 chronic BBB patients, with a mean follow-up of 30 months.
- Infranodal conduction time (H-Q) was measured, and patients were categorized based on H-Q interval duration.
- Subgroups underwent prophylactic pacing or ventricular stimulation studies.
Main Results:
- Patients with H-Q ≥ 70 ms showed a significantly higher incidence of AV block (12%) compared to those with H-Q < 70 ms (3.5%).
- An H-Q interval ≥ 100 ms was associated with a 25% incidence of AV block.
- Prophylactic pacing did not significantly alter symptom relief or survival rates.
- Ventricular tachycardia was induced in 14 of 25 syncope patients undergoing ventricular stimulation.
Conclusions:
- A markedly prolonged H-Q interval (≥ 100 ms) is a valuable predictor of spontaneous AV block in chronic BBB.
- Prophylactic pacing offers no benefit for symptom relief or survival in this patient cohort.
- Electrophysiologic and ventricular stimulation studies are indicated for BBB patients experiencing syncope.
Abstract:
A total of 401 patients with chronic bundle branch block underwent electrophysiologic studies and were followed for a mean of approximately 30 months. Patients with an infranodal conduction time (H-Q) greater than or equal to 70 ms had a significantly higher incidence of progression to spontaneous second-degree or third-degree atrioventricular (AV) block (12%) compared with those with H-Q less than 70 ms (3.5%). The incidence of AV block was 25% for those with H-Q greater than or equal to 100 ms. Although the incidences of all deaths and cardiac deaths were higher for the H-Q greater than or equal to 70 ms group, there was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of sudden deaths in the two groups. A subgroup of 77 patients underwent prophylactic pacemaker insertion based on the presence of transient neurologic symptoms and/or a prolonged H-Q interval. We found no significant difference in the incidence of relief of symptoms or incidence of cardiac or sudden deaths between paced and unpaced groups. A subgroup of 25 patients with syncope underwent ventricular stimulation studies and ventricular tachycardia was induced in 14. We conclude that a markedly prolonged H-Q interval (greater than or equal to 100 ms) may be of value in detection of spontaneous AV block. Prophylactic pacing is of no value in either relief of symptoms or prolongation of life. Complete electrophysiologic studies, including ventricular stimulation studies, are indicated for patients with bundle branch block and syncope.
Related Concept Videos
Depolarizing Blockers: Pharmocokinetics
Electrophysiology of Normal Cardiac Rhythm
Dysrhythmias IV: Characteristics of Bradyarrhythmias
Dysrhythmias V: Evaluating Dysrhythmias
Dysrhythmias VI: Management of Dysrhythmias
ECG Interpretation of Arrhythmias II: Atrial, Junctional and Ventricular Arrhythmias

