Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Interference in pacemakers.

W Irnich

    Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology : PACE
    |November 1, 1984
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Electromagnetic interference (EMI) poses a significant risk to pacemakers, with device performance varying widely across manufacturers. This study proposes improved methods for interference detection, protection, and testing to ensure patient safety.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Fibrillation threshold induced by alternating current and alternating voltage.

    Biomedizinische Technik. Biomedical engineering·2011
    Same author

    Do gender differences exist in pacemaker implantation?--results of an obligatory external quality control program.

    Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology·2009
    Same author

    Do endoscopy capsules interfere with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators?

    Endoscopy·2009
    Same author

    Capsule endoscopy and cardiac pacemakers: investigation for possible interference.

    Endoscopy·2007
    Same author

    Post-mortem evaluation of 415 pacemakers: in situ measurements and bench tests.

    Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology·2005
    Same author

    Re: is the optimal tilt really unknown?

    Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE·2001
    Same journal

    A Case of Permanent Pacemaker Implantation via the Epicardial Approach Using the 3830 Lead in an 11-Day-Old Neonate (With Follow-Up of the Above Case).

    Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE·2026
    Same journal

    Cryoballoon Versus Radiofrequency Ablation for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.

    Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE·2026
    Same journal

    Tilt Test Duration in Suspected Vasovagal Syncope: Temporal Patterns and Diagnostic Yield in Patients From Central China.

    Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE·2026
    Same journal

    Combined Leadless Pacing and Subcutaneous ICD Therapy in Long QT Syndromes.

    Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE·2026
    Same journal

    Association of Anesthesia Modality With Procedural Parameters and Clinical Outcomes in PVI for Atrial Fibrillation.

    Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE·2026
    Same journal

    Zero-Fluoroscopy Cryoballoon Ablation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation in a Patient With Dextrocardia: A Case Report.

    Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Biomedical Engineering
    • Medical Device Technology
    • Electromagnetics

    Background:

    • Pacemakers are susceptible to electromagnetic interference (EMI) from various sources.
    • Existing interference detection and protection methods have limitations.
    • Variability in pacemaker design complicates generalization of interference issues.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To outline sources of EMI affecting pacemakers.
    • To review current interference detection and protection methods, including their pros and cons.
    • To propose enhanced strategies for interference suppression and a standardized testing procedure.

    Main Methods:

    • Comparative analysis of 16 pacemakers from ten manufacturers against diverse interference sources.
    • Case study of an electric steel furnace's magnetic field impact on pacemakers.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Development of guidelines for electrotherapy treatment of pacemaker patients.

    • Main Results:

    • Significant variability in pacemaker susceptibility to EMI was observed, precluding generalization.
    • An electric steel furnace's magnetic field was analyzed as a specific interference example.
    • Guidelines for electrotherapy were established, and a novel test procedure was proposed.

    Conclusions:

    • Pacemaker interference is a complex issue with high device-specific variability.
    • A standardized testing procedure is crucial for characterizing and mitigating EMI risks.
    • Improved interference suppression strategies are needed to enhance pacemaker reliability and patient safety.