Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Similarity-related channel interactions in visual processing.

W K Estes

    Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance
    |June 1, 1982
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Letter identification in relation to linguistic context and masking conditions.

    Memory & cognition·2013
    Same author

    Memorial minute for B. F. Skinner.

    The Behavior analyst·2012
    Same author

    Activity anorexia: An interplay between basic and applied behavior analysis.

    The Behavior analyst·2012
    Same author

    Risks of drawing inferences about cognitive processes from model fits to individual versus average performance.

    Psychonomic bulletin & review·2005
    Same author

    Predicting true patterns of cognitive performance from noisy data.

    Psychonomic bulletin & review·2005
    Same author

    On the processes underlying stimulus-familiarity effects in recognition of words and nonwords.

    Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2002
    Same journal

    Human thermal sensitivity drifts at extreme temperatures.

    Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
    Same journal

    Dynamic competition between selective attention and spatial prediction during visual search.

    Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
    Same journal

    Encapsulation of the visual perception of social events from semantic priming.

    Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
    Same journal

    Biasmapping: Idiosyncratic covert search in the vicinity of fixation.

    Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
    Same journal

    What are you still waiting for? Fricative recognition shows encapsulated processing and is partially predicted by secondary cue reliance.

    Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
    Same journal

    Eye movements reveal that drivers can predict the location of hazards in dynamic road scenes but gaze and awareness are dissociable.

    Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
    See all related articles

    Visual letter interference depends on similarity and spacing. High similarity can hinder identification, while lower similarity impacts response bias and spatial memory, influencing visual processing.

    Area of Science:

    • Visual perception
    • Cognitive psychology
    • Human factors

    Background:

    • Lateral interference in visual letter identification is influenced by both letter similarity and physical separation.
    • Understanding the interplay of these factors is crucial for models of visual processing.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate the relationship between target-flanker similarity and letter identification performance.
    • To differentiate the roles of featural information extraction versus response criteria in visual interference.

    Main Methods:

    • Two experiments were conducted using a three-letter display task.
    • Key variables manipulated included target-flanker similarity, spatial separation, visual field location, postmask delay, and exposure duration.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • Target-flanker similarity showed a nonmonotonic effect on identification, with a minimum at intermediate similarity levels.
    • Information about similarity is available even when individual letters cannot be identified.
    • Visibility factors (exposure, masking, location, separation) affect featural information extraction, while similarity impacts response bias and spatial encoding.

    Conclusions:

    • A model is proposed where visibility factors influence feature extraction for letter identification.
    • Visual similarity affects performance through response biases and spatial information processing, rather than direct featural interference.
    • Existing literature on similarity effects in letter identification can be explained by these mechanisms.