Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The moon illusion: II. A reference theory.

J C Baird

    Journal of Experimental Psychology. General
    |September 1, 1982
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    This study explains the moon illusion using sky and ground cues for size and distance perception. Quantitative models integrating both factors successfully explain experimental data on this visual puzzle.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    A Tarantula Bite.

    Daniel's Texas medical journal·2023
    Same author

    Circular polarization of vacuum ultraviolet light by piezobirefringence.

    Applied optics·2010
    Same author

    Endogenous opioids modify dyspnoea during treadmill exercise in patients with COPD.

    The European respiratory journal·2009
    Same author

    The effects of added nanoparticles on aqueous kaolinite suspensions II. Rheological effects.

    Journal of colloid and interface science·2006
    Same author

    A computer method for assessing satisfaction with hearing aids.

    International journal of audiology·2006
    Same author

    The effects of added nanoparticles on aqueous kaolinite suspensions. I. Structural effects.

    Journal of colloid and interface science·2005
    Same journal

    Executive function and social behavior: Causal evidence from loading working memory and inhibitory control.

    Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
    Same journal

    Correction to "Your research is public engagement: A case for more intentional science communication in research with human subjects" by Vaughn (2026).

    Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
    Same journal

    Correction to "Costs and benefits of acting extraverted: A randomized controlled trial" by Jacques-Hamilton et al. (2019).

    Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
    Same journal

    Conveying (discrete) emotionality with novel words.

    Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
    Same journal

    Physical actions shape moral choices: Environment-directed movements reduce cheating in young children.

    Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
    Same journal

    From chunks to schemas: Learning in the Hebb repetition paradigm.

    Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Visual Perception
    • Psychophysics
    • Cognitive Science

    Background:

    • The moon illusion, a long-standing puzzle in visual perception, describes the apparent change in the moon's size depending on its position in the sky.
    • Previous theories have offered explanations but often relied on incomplete assumptions regarding environmental cues.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To propose a new theory explaining the moon illusion and related size/distance perception phenomena in natural outdoor environments.
    • To integrate previously disparate theoretical elements into a cohesive framework.

    Main Methods:

    • Developed a quantitative reference theory incorporating both the sky and ground as critical referents for judging the moon's spatial extent.
    • Applied computational models based on this theory to analyze existing parametric data from seminal studies (Holway and Boring, Kaufman and Rock).

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • The proposed theory posits that neither the sky nor the ground alone fully explains the moon illusion.
    • Quantitative models incorporating both sky and ground cues demonstrated strong agreement with established experimental findings.
    • The theory successfully accounts for size and distance perception variations observed in natural settings.

    Conclusions:

    • The integrated reference theory provides a robust explanation for the moon illusion by considering multiple environmental cues.
    • This formulation offers new avenues for theoretical development and experimental validation in visual perception research.
    • The findings contribute to understanding one of the most enduring mysteries in how humans perceive their environment.