Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Time course analysis of the Stroop phenomenon.

M O Glaser, W R Glaser

    Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance
    |December 1, 1982
    PubMed
    Summary

    This study explores the Stroop phenomenon by temporally separating stimulus components. Findings reveal distinct temporal dynamics of facilitation and inhibition, suggesting early conflict processing before response execution.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Picture naming.

    Cognition·1992
    Same author

    Context effects in stroop-like word and picture processing.

    Journal of experimental psychology. General·1989
    Same author

    The time course of picture-word interference.

    Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·1984
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Cognitive Psychology
    • Experimental Psychology

    Background:

    • The Stroop phenomenon demonstrates interference in reaction time when processing conflicting information.
    • Dyer's (1971) work initiated research into temporal separation of stimulus components in the Stroop task.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate the response competition hypothesis of the Stroop phenomenon.
    • To generalize Dyer's findings by introducing variations in task, stimulus presentation, probability, and discrimination type.

    Main Methods:

    • Temporally separating color and word components of stimuli (incongruent, control, congruent).
    • Including both color-naming and reading tasks.
    • Varying the temporal order and probabilities of stimulus components.
    • Utilizing different stimulus types (color-word, color-color, word-word).
    • Comparing functional and sequential discrimination tasks.

    Main Results:

    • Identified slow facilitation linked to response bias.
    • Observed an inhibitory counterpart to this slow facilitation.
    • Detected a fast, strong inhibition without facilitation, potentially representing early Stroop conflict.

    Conclusions:

    • The Stroop effect involves complex temporal dynamics of facilitation and inhibition.
    • Early, rapid inhibition occurs before response execution, distinct from response bias effects.
    • Understanding these temporal relations enhances models of cognitive conflict and processing speed.

    Related Experiment Videos