Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Dyslexic and normal readers' eye movements.

R K Olson, R Kliegl, B J Davidson

    Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance
    |October 1, 1983
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Home-based exercise programmes improve physical fitness of healthy older adults: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis with relevance for COVID-19.

    Ageing research reviews·2021
    Same author

    Genome-wide screening for DNA variants associated with reading and language traits.

    Genes, brain, and behavior·2014
    Same author

    Computer-based phonological awareness and reading instruction.

    Annals of dyslexia·2013
    Same author

    Interference effects in tone memory.

    Memory & cognition·2011
    Same author

    Differential genetic etiology of reading difficulties as a function of IQ: an update.

    Behavior genetics·2010
    Same author

    The heritability of general cognitive ability increases linearly from childhood to young adulthood.

    Molecular psychiatry·2009
    Same journal

    Human thermal sensitivity drifts at extreme temperatures.

    Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
    Same journal

    Dynamic competition between selective attention and spatial prediction during visual search.

    Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
    Same journal

    Encapsulation of the visual perception of social events from semantic priming.

    Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
    Same journal

    Biasmapping: Idiosyncratic covert search in the vicinity of fixation.

    Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
    Same journal

    What are you still waiting for? Fricative recognition shows encapsulated processing and is partially predicted by secondary cue reliance.

    Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
    Same journal

    Eye movements reveal that drivers can predict the location of hazards in dynamic road scenes but gaze and awareness are dissociable.

    Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
    See all related articles

    This study found no difference in oculomotor control between dyslexic and normal readers during tracking tasks. Dyslexia

    Area of Science:

    • Neuroscience
    • Cognitive Psychology
    • Developmental Psychology

    Background:

    • Reading is a complex cognitive process involving visual perception and oculomotor control.
    • Previous research suggested potential links between oculomotor deficits and dyslexia.
    • Understanding the precise relationship between eye movements and reading ability is crucial for effective interventions.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate whether differences in oculomotor control (eye movements) distinguish dyslexic readers from normal readers.
    • To determine if oculomotor deficits are a causal factor in dyslexia or if they are secondary to other cognitive differences.
    • To explore the relationship between oculomotor efficiency in reading and in a non-reading task.

    Main Methods:

    • Comparison of eye movements (saccades, regressions, fixation stability) in dyslexic and normal readers.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Two tasks were employed: tracking a moving fixation point and reading text.
  • Analysis of individual differences in oculomotor efficiency within both reading groups.

    • Main Results:

    • No significant differences were observed in the number of saccades, percentage of regressions, or fixation stability between dyslexic and normal readers during the moving point tracking task.
    • This suggests that basic oculomotor control, as measured by tracking, is not impaired in dyslexia.
    • Individual variations in oculomotor efficiency were present in both groups and showed correlations between the tracking and reading tasks.

    Conclusions:

    • Defective oculomotor control is unlikely to be a primary cause of dyslexia.
    • Abnormal eye movements observed in dyslexic individuals during reading are more likely attributable to higher-level cognitive processes, not motor control issues.
    • Oculomotor efficiency can vary independently of reading ability, with consistent patterns across different tasks.