Related Experiment Videos
Decision-making processes in augmentative communication
The Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders
|February 1, 1984
Summary
Clinicians can now objectively assess augmentative communication needs using systematic matrices. These tools aid in selecting appropriate augmentative communication strategies and devices for non-speaking individuals.
Area of Science:
- Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC)
- Speech-Language Pathology
- Assistive Technology
Background:
- A significant population could benefit from augmentative communication (AC).
- Current assessment methods for AC lack objective criteria.
- Clinicians require structured tools for AC decision-making.
Purpose of the Study:
- To introduce a systematic, matrix-based approach for AC assessment.
- To provide clinicians with objective procedures for evaluating non-speaking clients.
- To facilitate informed decision-making regarding AC implementation.
Main Methods:
- Development of three matrices for AC assessment.
- Matrix 1: Appropriateness of AC (primary vs. complementary).
- Matrix 2: Modes of AC (manual systems, boards, electronic devices).
- Matrix 3: Code information (visual and manual codes).
Main Results:
- Matrices offer a systematic decision-making procedure for AC.
- Provides comprehensive information on AC modes and codes.
- Enables objective evaluation and organization of client data.
Conclusions:
- The matrices offer an objective framework for AC assessment.
- Facilitates effective implementation of AC strategies.
- Improves clinical decision-making for non-speaking clients.