Related Experiment Videos
Gold vs D-penicillamine double blind study and followup
The Journal of Rheumatology
|December 1, 1984
Summary
This study found no significant differences between gold and penicillamine treatments for rheumatoid arthritis. Some patients achieved remission and continued treatment long-term without significant toxicity.
Area of Science:
- Rheumatology
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Rheumatoid arthritis is a chronic autoimmune disease.
- Gold compounds and penicillamine are disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs).
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy and safety of gold and penicillamine in rheumatoid arthritis patients.
- To assess long-term outcomes and toxicity of these treatments.
Main Methods:
- Controlled, randomized, double-blind study design.
- Inclusion of 50 patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
- Long-term follow-up of 55 months.
Main Results:
- No significant differences observed in clinical outcomes, laboratory variables, or toxicity between gold and penicillamine.
- A substantial number of patients discontinued both treatments over time.
- Patients achieving remission with either gold or penicillamine often continued therapy.
Conclusions:
- Gold and penicillamine show comparable efficacy and safety profiles for rheumatoid arthritis.
- Long-term treatment adherence is influenced by disease remission.
- Penicillamine demonstrated no significant immunological toxicity in this cohort.