The effectiveness of laboratory vs written examinations in an anatomy course

This paper reports a two-year study on the methods used to evaluate 63 junior occupational therapy students in a musculo-skeletal anatomy course offered at the University of Florida. Laboratory learning processes were not significantly different compared to class learning processes as shown by test results. There was also no significant difference between laboratory and written examination scores in anatomy when compared with final grades in subsequent courses with both laboratory and lecture components. This study was undertaken because of the varying attitudes of students and faculty and their knowledge about the most efficient and productive manner in which to conduct the course. Very little research on educational methods has been completed in our profession and the validation of current methods is needed.