Comparison of four methods for differentiation of Staphylococcus aureus from other Micrococcaceae in the routine...

Four methods for the identification of Staphylococcus aureus (tube coagulase test, thermostable nuclease test, indirect agglutination of fibrinogen coated erythrocytes and a commercial latex kit: SeroSTAT Staphylococcus Test) have been compared. Clinical isolates (698) and 40 reference strains of Micrococcaceae were included in the study together with control organisms. The coagulase test gave no false positive results but 39/406 clinical isolates of S. aureus were negative at 2h and one half were only weakly positive. At 18 h, all but 2 of 406 isolates gave a positive reaction. The thermostable nuclease test was very specific; no clinical isolates of S. aureus gave negative results and no "coagulase-negative" clinical isolates gave a definite positive reaction. The indirect haemagglutination method was sometimes difficult to interpret and frequently gave negative or doubtful results for S. aureus. The SeroSTAT test was easy to use and interpret and was specific; the method is suitable for routine laboratory use, particularly when a rapid result is desirable.