Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Problems with diagnostic criteria for depression.

B J Carroll

    The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
    |July 1, 1984
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Current psychiatric diagnostic systems for depression lack reliability and validity. Improving classification requires more specific symptoms, objective recording, and scientific validation including biological markers.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    A proof of concept case series of botulinum toxin a treatment for ischemic feet due to Raynaud's phenomenon.

    Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS·2026
    Same author

    Sulodexide in venous disease.

    Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH·2018
    Same author

    A genome-wide association study of antidepressant response in Koreans.

    Translational psychiatry·2015
    Same author

    Clinical science and biomarkers: against RDoC.

    Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica·2015
    Same author

    A genome-wide association study of antidepressant response in Koreans.

    Translational psychiatry·2015
    Same author

    Association of the choline acetyltransferase gene with responsiveness to acetylcholinesterase inhibitors in Alzheimer's disease.

    Pharmacopsychiatry·2015
    Same journal

    Major Depressive Disorder and PTSD Treatment Outcome in Interpersonal Psychotherapy and Prolonged Exposure.

    The Journal of clinical psychiatry·2026
    Same journal

    Psychiatrists and Medical Aid in Dying: Entering Uncharted Waters.

    The Journal of clinical psychiatry·2026
    Same journal

    Mind and Metabolism in Crisis: US Mortality Involving Obesity and Psychiatric Disorders-Trends, Disparities, and ARIMA Projections.

    The Journal of clinical psychiatry·2026
    Same journal

    Generative AI for the Clinical Psychopharmacologist: Is It Ready for Prime Time?

    The Journal of clinical psychiatry·2026
    Same journal

    Posttrauma Benzodiazepine Use and Subsequent PTSD: A Population-Wide Analysis Following Extreme Traumatic Exposure.

    The Journal of clinical psychiatry·2026
    Same journal

    The Challenges of PTSD Prevention: Placing Benzodiazepine Use in Context.

    The Journal of clinical psychiatry·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Psychiatry
    • Clinical Psychology
    • Psychopathology

    Background:

    • Major psychiatric diagnostic systems face limitations in classifying mental health conditions.
    • Current diagnostic criteria for depression and its subtypes exhibit issues with reliability and validity.
    • The use of these diagnoses as independent variables in clinical research is problematic.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To discuss the limitations of current psychiatric diagnostic systems, focusing on depression.
    • To propose methods for improving the classification of depressive disorders.
    • To advocate for the application of scientific validation procedures in psychiatric nosology.

    Main Methods:

    • Critical review of existing psychiatric diagnostic systems.
    • Analysis of the reliability and validity of standard depression diagnoses.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Exploration of potential improvements such as increased symptom specificity, differential weighting, and objective recording.
  • Examination of scientific validation procedures including natural history, treatment response, and laboratory markers.

    • Main Results:

    • Standard psychiatric diagnoses, particularly for depression, lack demonstrated reliability and validity.
    • Current classification methods are insufficient for precise clinical research and application.
    • Objective recording and enhanced symptom sensitivity are crucial for diagnostic improvement.

    Conclusions:

    • Psychiatric diagnostic systems require significant improvement to enhance their scientific basis.
    • Validation of depression classification through biological markers (e.g., dexamethasone suppression test, sleep EEG) and clinical course is essential.
    • More rigorous scientific validation is necessary for reliable and valid psychiatric diagnoses.