Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A classification for biomedical research reports.

J C Bailar, T A Louis, P W Lavori

    The New England Journal of Medicine
    |December 6, 1984
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Data Sharing, Clinical Trials, and Biomarkers in Precision Oncology: Challenges, Opportunities, and Programs at the Department of Veterans Affairs.

    Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics·2017
    Same author

    Perceived helpfulness of the individual components of a behavioural weight loss program: results from the Hopkins POWER Trial.

    Obesity science & practice·2016
    Same author

    Complete remission after rituximab therapy in an HIV-positive patient with pemphigus vulgaris.

    The British journal of dermatology·2015
    Same author

    Two-year weight-loss maintenance in primary care-based Diabetes Prevention Program lifestyle interventions.

    Nutrition & diabetes·2013
    Same author

    Patient-reported outcomes in the practice-based opportunities for weight reduction (POWER) trial.

    Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation·2013
    Same author

    Profiles of family needs of children and youth with cerebral palsy.

    Child: care, health and development·2011
    Same journal

    Sparganosis.

    The New England journal of medicine·2026
    Same journal

    Caring for an Aging America - The Looming Crisis of the Long-Term-Care Workforce.

    The New England journal of medicine·2026
    Same journal

    For Those Left Behind.

    The New England journal of medicine·2026
    Same journal

    Colliding Forces - The Aging of the Baby Boom Generation and Contracting Nursing-Home Supply.

    The New England journal of medicine·2026
    Same journal

    Mandated State-Level Surveillance of Assisted Reproductive Technology - An Emerging Threat in the United States.

    The New England journal of medicine·2026
    Same journal

    Ebola at 50 - Lessons for Outbreak Response and Preparedness.

    The New England journal of medicine·2026
    See all related articles

    This study classifies biomedical research designs from 1978-1979 based on key features like admission rules and controls. Proper classification is crucial for interpreting research findings and ensuring complete reporting.

    Area of Science:

    • Biomedical research methodology
    • Scientific study design

    Background:

    • Biomedical research encompasses diverse designs across laboratory, clinical, and population studies.
    • Key design elements like admission rules, treatment allocation, and control groups significantly influence scientific inference strength.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To classify original articles published in the New England Journal of Medicine from 1978-1979 based on study design features.
    • To highlight critical aspects of study design and performance for selecting appropriate research approaches and protocols.

    Main Methods:

    • Classification of 332 original articles from the New England Journal of Medicine (1978-1979).
    • Analysis based on critical study design features including admission rules, treatment allocation methods, and use of controls.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • A classification system was developed and applied to assess the quality of biomedical research designs.
    • The classification highlights the importance of investigators' intent in study execution and analysis.

    Conclusions:

    • A robust classification of study design is essential for accurate interpretation of biomedical research.
    • Authors are urged to provide sufficient detail for such classifications to avoid limiting research interpretation due to incomplete reporting.