Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Clio, fallacies, and homosexuality.

Journal of Homosexuality

|January 1, 1984

Summary

This study identifies major errors in historical accounts of male homosexuality. It highlights issues like unproven assumptions, oversimplification, and viewing history out of context.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Eight cases of feline cutaneous leishmaniasis in Texas.

Veterinary pathology·2010

Same author

A pediatric AIDS patient with superior mesenteric artery syndrome.

AIDS patient care and STDs·2002

Same author

Clenbuterol ingestion causing prolonged tachycardia, hypokalemia, and hypophosphatemia with confirmation by quantitative levels.

Journal of toxicology. Clinical toxicology·2001

Same author

Vaginal laceration and perforation resulting from first coitus.

Pediatric emergency care·2001

Same author

Rational use of toxicology testing in children.

Current opinion in pediatrics·2001

Same author

One face of a transmembrane helix is crucial in mechanosensitive channel gating.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·1998

Area of Science:

Historical studies
Social history
Gender studies

Background:

Historical writing on male homosexuality often contains significant analytical errors.
Scholarly discourse needs to address methodological fallacies in historical interpretation.

Observation:

Common fallacies include presenting assumptions as facts.
Attributing complex social phenomena to single causes is problematic.
Semantic distortion, ethnocentrism, and anachronism distort historical understanding.

Findings:

The concepts of historicism and the pathetic fallacy represent flawed historical frameworks.
Tunnel history, which lacks broad contextualization, is a significant interpretive error.

Implications:

Recognizing these fallacies is crucial for accurate historical scholarship on male homosexuality.
Improved methodologies can lead to a more nuanced understanding of the past.
This analysis provides a framework for critically evaluating historical narratives.

Related Experiment Videos