Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[Avoiding hypoxemia during anesthesia].

D N Mihic, E Binkert

    Der Anaesthesist
    |November 1, 1983
    PubMed
    Summary

    Unexpected hypoxemia during anesthesia is common with an inspiratory oxygen fraction (FiO2) of 0.33. Increasing FiO2 to 0.40 significantly reduces hypoxemia risk, particularly in older patients.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Optimal regional anaesthesia for abdominal hysterectomy: combined subarachnoid and epidural block compared with other regional techniques.

    European journal of anaesthesiology·1993
    Same author

    [Postspinal headaches, needle surfaces and longitudinal orientation of the dural fibers. Results of a survey].

    Regional-Anaesthesie·1986
    Same author

    [Is 0.5% bupivacaine solution isobaric?].

    Regional-Anaesthesie·1984
    Same author

    Is the application of an Esmarch bandage justified?

    Anesthesiology·1984
    Same author

    [Fatal lung embolism following ischemia and peridural anesthesia].

    Regional-Anaesthesie·1983
    Same author

    [The 1st orotracheal intubation].

    Der Anaesthesist·1983

    Area of Science:

    • Anesthesiology
    • Respiratory Physiology

    Background:

    • Unexpected hypoxemia can occur during general anesthesia.
    • Patient factors and oxygen administration influence oxygenation levels.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate the incidence of unexpected hypoxemia in healthy patients undergoing peripheral surgery.
    • To evaluate the safety of different inspiratory oxygen fractions (FiO2) and compare with anesthesiologists' opinions.

    Main Methods:

    • Studied 230 healthy patients, controlling for age, smoking, anesthesia/surgery type, body position, FiO2, and respiratory parameters.
    • Measured arterial oxygen (paO2) and carbon dioxide (paCO2) tension.
    • Surveyed anesthesiologists in the US, West Germany, and Switzerland regarding safe FiO2 and paO2 limits.

    Main Results:

    • 10% of patients on FiO2 0.33 and 3.3% on FiO2 0.40 experienced hypoxemia (paO2 < 80 mm Hg).
    • Older patients (>60) on FiO2 0.33 had a 25% hypoxemia rate.
    • Most surveyed anesthesiologists use FiO2 0.33, expecting paO2 > 80 mm Hg.

    Conclusions:

    • FiO2 of 0.33 is not consistently safe, with a 10% hypoxemia incidence.
    • Increasing FiO2 to 0.40 reduces hypoxemia, especially in patients over 40.
    • Anesthesiologists' expectations of safe oxygenation may not align with observed patient outcomes.

    Related Experiment Videos