Related Experiment Videos
An investigation into the benefits of resiting nasoenteric feeding tubes
Insights
A new palatal appliance for feeding tubes in preterm infants significantly reduced apnea and breathing issues. This intervention improved respiratory outcomes, offering a safer alternative to traditional nasal tubes.
Area of Science:
- Neonatal Medicine
- Pediatric Respiratory Medicine
- Medical Device Innovation
Background:
- Partial nasal obstruction in preterm infants elevates airway resistance, complicating feeding.
- Nasal feeding tubes are common due to difficulties in securing oral tubes, despite potential airway issues.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of a novel palatal appliance on feeding tube placement and infant respiratory outcomes.
- To compare respiratory parameters between infants using a palatal appliance with oroenteric tubes and those with nasoenteric tubes.
Main Methods:
- A trial involving 29 preterm infants monitored respiratory function.
- Infants were assessed on days 3 and/or 7 after insertion of either the palatal appliance with oroenteric tubes or control nasoenteric tubes.
- A second study examined apnea rates and transcutaneous oxygen levels (PO2) after feeding tube removal.
Main Results:
- Infants using the palatal appliance demonstrated significantly reduced periodic breathing, central apnea, and movement after seven days compared to the control group.
- Feeding tube removal in infants with long-term tube placement led to decreased apnea rates.
- A significant increase in transcutaneous PO2 was observed post-feeding tube removal.
Conclusions:
- The palatal appliance is a safe and effective method for positioning oroenteric feeding tubes in preterm infants.
- This intervention improves respiratory stability, reducing apnea and periodic breathing.
- Optimizing feeding tube management, including removal, positively impacts respiratory outcomes in preterm neonates.
Abstract:
Partial nasal obstruction in preterm infants increases the airway resistance. In spite of this, nasal feeding tubes are often used, if only because oral tubes are difficult to secure. A palatal appliance has been devised that maintains the position of oroenteric feeding tube(s) and is not associated with local complications. In order to assess the effects of resiting feeding tubes, two related studies were carried out. The first study, a trial, included respiratory monitoring of 29 infants on the third and/or seventh day after either the appliance and oroenteric tubes had been inserted, or, in the control group, after the nasoenteric tubes had been passed. After seven days, the infants using the palatal appliance had significantly less periodic breathing, central apnea, and movement than the control group. The second study showed that the removal of feeding tubes that had been in situ for several days reduced apnea rates and produced a significant increase in transcutaneous PO2.