Related Experiment Videos
Evaluation of student performance in psychotherapy
Journal of Clinical Psychology
|July 1, 1984
Summary
Psychology students often lack clear evaluation criteria for psychotherapy training, with many perceiving bias. A combination of client outcomes and specific therapeutic skills is recommended for fair assessment.
Area of Science:
- Psychology
- Psychotherapy Training
- Clinical Psychology Education
Background:
- In 1970, the American Psychological Association (APA) recommended explicit evaluation criteria for psychotherapy training.
- A survey revealed that many graduate students lack clarity on performance evaluation metrics.
- Students reported concerns about perceived bias in psychotherapy training assessments.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the awareness of evaluation criteria among graduate students in psychotherapy training.
- To explore student perceptions regarding the basis of their performance evaluations.
- To discuss and recommend appropriate criteria for evaluating psychotherapy skills.
Main Methods:
- An informal survey was conducted with advanced clinical psychology graduate students (N=17).
- The survey assessed students' knowledge of evaluation criteria for psychotherapy practice.
- Student perceptions of evaluation basis (bias vs. objective criteria) were gathered.
Main Results:
- 77% of surveyed students were unaware of or uncertain about their psychotherapy evaluation criteria.
- A significant portion of students suspected their evaluations were influenced by personal biases.
- The study highlighted a gap between recommended and actual evaluation practices.
Conclusions:
- There is a critical need for transparent and explicit evaluation criteria in psychotherapy training programs.
- A balanced approach, integrating client outcomes with specific therapeutic competencies, is advised.
- Implementing clear criteria can enhance training effectiveness and reduce perceived subjectivity.