Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Conflicts, trade-offs, and preference measurement.

B Seaton, R H Vogel

    Health Services Research
    |January 1, 1978
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    This study introduces novel preference measurement techniques, including collapsed orthogonal arrays and monotonic analysis of variance, to enhance decision-making efficiency and individual utility scale analysis for complex factors.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    The role of interfacial binding in the activation of Streptomyces chromofuscus phospholipase D by phosphatidic acid.

    The Journal of biological chemistry·1999
    Same author

    The smart card: a tool for smart hospitals.

    Dimensions in health service·1991
    Same author

    Three-dimensional reconstruction from electron micrographs of disordered specimens. I. Method.

    Ultramicroscopy·1988
    Same author

    Three-dimensional reconstruction from electron micrographs of disordered specimens. II. Implementation and results.

    Ultramicroscopy·1988
    Same author

    Isolation of Haemophilus influenzae genes that suppress Escherichia coli polA mutations.

    Journal of bacteriology·1987
    Same author

    Envelope structure of Semliki Forest virus reconstructed from cryo-electron micrographs.

    Nature·1986
    Same journal

    The Association Between Sepsis Coding and Payment to U.S. Hospitals.

    Health services research·2026
    Same journal

    Stagnation in Achieving Recommended Methadone Doses in Opioid Use Disorder Treatment.

    Health services research·2026
    Same journal

    Promoting Transplant Access Through Dialysis Facility Performance Metrics: A Double-Edged Sword.

    Health services research·2026
    Same journal

    Understanding Medicaid Estate Recovery: The Experience of North Carolina and Policy Implications for Future Reforms.

    Health services research·2026
    Same journal

    Racial Disparities and Personal Responsibility Incentives in Medicaid.

    Health services research·2026
    Same journal

    Under-Documentation of Z-Codes in Hospitalizations of Homeless Shelter Users in New York City.

    Health services research·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Decision Analysis
    • Psychometrics
    • Health Services Management

    Background:

    • Preference measurement is crucial for informed decision-making in various fields.
    • Existing methods can be time-consuming and may not capture individual nuances.
    • Understanding group preferences is vital for implementing changes, especially in healthcare settings.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To extend the utility of preference measurement through innovative techniques.
    • To reduce the time respondents spend indicating preferences among numerous factors.
    • To establish individual and group utility scales for better decision support.

    Main Methods:

    • Utilizing collapsed orthogonal arrays of factor combinations to streamline preference data collection.
    • Employing monotonic analysis of variance (MANOVA) to derive individual and group utility scales.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Focusing on the measurement of main effects in preference structures.

    • Main Results:

    • The proposed techniques significantly reduce the time required for preference assessment.
    • Individual utility scales provide insights into diverse preferences within a group.
    • Comparison of individual scales aids in understanding and managing dissenting opinions.

    Conclusions:

    • Collapsed orthogonal arrays and monotonic analysis of variance offer a more efficient and insightful approach to preference measurement.
    • The ability to compare individual utility scales enhances decision-maker effectiveness, particularly in managing group dynamics.
    • These methods are applicable to complex decision-making scenarios, such as hospital facility changes.