Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Different performance of two commercial nebulizers.

W Arossa, F Quagliotti, M Sala

    Respiration; International Review of Thoracic Diseases
    |January 1, 1984
    PubMed
    Summary

    High variability in nebulizer output characteristics was found between DeVilbiss 646 and Mefar devices. These findings indicate neither nebulizer is suitable as a standard for bronchial provocation testing.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    AI WAVEMAR: Design of an artificial intelligence model for detecting suspicious findings in screening mammography.

    Radiologia·2026
    Same author

    Window-of-opportunity trials to screen effective agents and optimize dose in breast cancer prevention.

    NPJ breast cancer·2025
    Same author

    The Future of Breast Cancer Research in the Survivorship Field.

    Oncology and therapy·2023
    Same author

    Drug-related problems in patients admitted for SARS-CoV-2 infection during the COVID-19 pandemic.

    Frontiers in pharmacology·2022
    Same author

    Safety of fertility preservation techniques before and after anticancer treatments in young women with breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Human reproduction (Oxford, England)·2022
    Same author

    Perceptions from nurses, surgeons, and anesthetists about the use and benefits of the surgical checklist in a teaching hospital.

    Journal of healthcare quality research·2021

    Area of Science:

    • Respiratory medicine
    • Medical device engineering

    Background:

    • Nebulizers are crucial for delivering inhaled medications.
    • Standardization of nebulizer performance is essential for consistent therapeutic outcomes and diagnostic procedures like bronchial provocation.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To assess the output characteristic variability of DeVilbiss 646 and Mefar nebulizers.
    • To determine the suitability of these nebulizers for use in bronchial provocation.

    Main Methods:

    • Comparative analysis of nebulizer output.
    • Evaluation of airflow rate, nebulized liquid amount, and particle size distribution.
    • Testing of multiple units from both DeVilbiss 646 and Mefar brands.

    Main Results:

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Significant variability observed in airflow rate, nebulized liquid output, and particle size among individual nebulizers of both brands.
  • No consistent performance was identified within or between the DeVilbiss 646 and Mefar models.

    • Conclusions:

    • The high inter-device variability renders both DeVilbiss 646 and Mefar nebulizers unsuitable for standardization in bronchial provocation.
    • Further research is needed to identify or develop nebulizer devices with consistent and reliable output characteristics for clinical applications.