Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Routine culturing for Clostridium difficile?

R A Bowman, T V Riley

    Pathology
    |July 1, 1984
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Routine Clostridium difficile testing is not always necessary. Culturing only selected patients based on symptoms and history is adequate, reducing unnecessary laboratory workload.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Clostridioides difficile colonization and infection in a cohort of Australian adults with cystic fibrosis.

    The Journal of hospital infection·2021
    Same author

    Clostridium difficile and One Health.

    Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases·2019
    Same author

    In silico, in vitro and in vivo analysis of putative virulence factors identified in large clostridial toxin-negative, binary toxin- producing C. difficile strains.

    Anaerobe·2019
    Same author

    Recurrence of Clostridium difficile infection in the Western Australian population.

    Epidemiology and infection·2019
    Same author

    Status of vaccine research and development for Clostridium difficile.

    Vaccine·2019
    Same author

    Natural products show diverse mechanisms of action against Clostridium difficile.

    Journal of applied microbiology·2018
    Same journal

    Impact of the 2025 Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline on the diagnosis and management of primary aldosteronism for the clinical laboratory.

    Pathology·2026
    Same journal

    Cribriform intraductal carcinoma of the prostate may have a greater prognostic impact even than Gleason grade 5 conventional prostatic adenocarcinoma.

    Pathology·2026
    Same journal

    Bordetella pertussis: emerging epidemiology, diagnosis and management.

    Pathology·2026
    Same journal

    Development and validation of a real-time polymerase chain reaction for the detection of Haycocknema perplexum.

    Pathology·2026
    Same journal

    Recent advances in the understanding of TP53 in haematological malignancies.

    Pathology·2026
    Same journal

    Concurrent renal amyloid light chain amyloidosis, light chain crystalline podocytopathy and light chain proximal tubulopathy: a case report.

    Pathology·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Medical Microbiology
    • Infectious Diseases
    • Gastroenterology

    Background:

    • Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) diagnosis relies on laboratory testing.
    • The necessity of routine stool culturing for CDI is debated.
    • Targeted testing may be more efficient than universal screening.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To evaluate the efficacy of routine versus selective stool culturing for Clostridium difficile.
    • To determine if clinical criteria can adequately identify patients requiring C. difficile testing.

    Main Methods:

    • Prospective trial involving 408 stool specimens from 297 patients.
    • Specimens were analyzed for C. difficile via culture and cytotoxin detection.
    • Selective criteria included stool consistency, microscopy, antibiotic history, and inflammatory bowel disease.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • C. difficile was detected in 19.5% of selected patients (33/169).
    • Only one case (1/190) was found in the non-selected group.
    • Selective culturing identified the vast majority of positive cases.

    Conclusions:

    • Routine culturing of all stool specimens for C. difficile is not warranted.
    • Selective testing based on clinical assessment is sufficient.
    • Accurate clinical history and examination can guide appropriate C. difficile testing.