Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Facing up to the issues: reply to Hellige (1983).

M J Roszkowski, G E Snelbecker

    Brain and Cognition
    |October 1, 1983
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Pigmented villonodular synovitis of the temporomandibular joint.

    Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons·1996
    Same author

    Therapeutic advantage of recombinant human plasminogen activator in endocarditis: evidence from experiments in rabbits.

    Thrombosis and haemostasis·1995
    Same author

    Iatrogenic trigeminal nerve injury: diagnosis and treatment.

    Northwest dentistry·1993
    Same author

    Nurses' perceptions concerning computer uses before and after a computer literacy lecture.

    Computers in nursing·1985
    Same author

    The relationship between the performance greater than verbal (P greater than V) sign and violent behavior in a sample of mentally retarded subjects.

    The Journal of genetic psychology·1983
    Same author

    A comparison of the internal structure of the self-reported hand preference of mentally retarded and intellectually normal subjects.

    The Journal of genetic psychology·1983
    Same journal

    Gelastic dysarthria: Speech-triggered pathological laughter with evidence for a selective pontine gating mechanism.

    Brain and cognition·2026
    Same journal

    Brain correlates of linguistic-cognitive stimulation in neurotypical and Atypical older adult populations: A systematic review.

    Brain and cognition·2026
    Same journal

    Effects of Dieting on Neural Encoding of Preferences for Edible and Non-Edible Rewards: An ERP Study.

    Brain and cognition·2026
    Same journal

    Structural complexity of brain regions in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease.

    Brain and cognition·2026
    Same journal

    Spatial navigation training enhances performance on large-scale and small-scale spatial tasks through different neural mechanisms.

    Brain and cognition·2026
    Same journal

    Unraveling the link between brain injury and enhanced artistic skills.

    Brain and cognition·2026
    See all related articles

    This study addresses the chimeric-face technique, examining left visual field (LVF) bias in face perception and its relation to handedness. Findings suggest feature differences, not just hemisphere dominance, influence results.

    Area of Science:

    • Cognitive Psychology
    • Neuroscience
    • Human Behavior

    Background:

    • The chimeric-face technique is used to study visual field biases in face perception.
    • Hellige critiqued the technique's validity, attributing left visual field (LVF) bias to feature disparities rather than right hemisphere dominance.
    • This study rebuts that claim, asserting feature differences do not fully explain observed handedness effects.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To re-evaluate the chimeric-face technique's validity for assessing hand preference.
    • To investigate the influence of handedness and other variables on LVF bias in face perception.
    • To propose an explanation for LVF bias variations observed with corrected chimeric faces.

    Main Methods:

    • Analysis of data from the chimeric-face technique, including corrected mirror-image faces.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparison of results between left-handers and right-handers.
  • Examination of potential confounding variables affecting visual field biases.

    • Main Results:

    • While acknowledging feature differences in chimeric faces, the study argues this doesn't negate handedness effects.
    • Further data presented support the role of handedness in influencing LVF bias.
    • A hypothesis is proposed for the reduced LVF bias observed with true mirror-image stimuli.

    Conclusions:

    • The chimeric-face technique's interpretation requires careful consideration of handedness and stimulus properties.
    • Observed LVF biases are likely influenced by a complex interplay of factors, including handedness.
    • Further research is needed to fully elucidate the mechanisms underlying visual field biases in face perception.