Related Experiment Videos
The effect of denture cleansers on temporary soft liners
The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
|October 1, 1983
Summary
Selecting dental liners requires evaluating multiple properties, not just one. Some liners like Lynal and Hydro-Cast showed better cleanser resistance than others such as Viscogel.
Area of Science:
- Materials Science
- Biomaterials Engineering
- Dental Prosthetics
Background:
- Dental liners are crucial components in prosthetic applications.
- The interaction between dental liners and common cleaning agents is not fully understood.
- Material compatibility is essential for the longevity and performance of dental prosthetics.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of nine different cleansers on the properties of commonly used dental liners.
- To determine which liner materials exhibit superior resistance to degradation from cleaning solutions.
- To provide data-driven insights for selecting appropriate dental liners based on cleanser compatibility.
Main Methods:
- Circular samples of eight different dental liner materials were prepared.
- Samples were immersed in nine distinct cleanser solutions, with daily solution changes for one month.
- Six key properties were quantitatively assessed: color change, porosity, surface distortion, size change, water sorption, and solubility.
- Statistical analysis was employed to evaluate liner and cleanser performance.
Main Results:
- No single property could determine optimal liner selection; a multifactorial approach is necessary.
- Lynal, Tissuedyne, F.I.T.T., and Hydro-Cast demonstrated the highest resistance to cleanser effects, in descending order.
- Viscogel, Softone, and Veltec were the most adversely affected liners.
- Clorox/Calgon and Miller cleansers showed comparable overall performance, with Clorox/Calgon being compatible with six out of eight liners.
- Liner material thickness did not significantly influence the observed effects of the cleansers.
Conclusions:
- Dental liner selection should consider a comprehensive evaluation of multiple material properties in conjunction with expected cleaning protocols.
- Certain liner materials (Lynal, Tissuedyne, F.I.T.T., Hydro-Cast) offer better durability against common dental cleansers.
- Cleanser choice significantly impacts liner integrity, with Clorox/Calgon and Miller exhibiting moderate to good compatibility across various liners.