Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

When words collide: orthographic and phonological interference during word processing.

J Polich, G McCarthy, W S Wang

    Biological Psychology
    |May 1, 1983
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    An exploratory study of obstetrics trainees' experiences of breaking bad news.

    The clinical teacher·2023
    Same author

    Reflective practice in psychiatric training: Balint groups during COVID-19.

    Irish journal of psychological medicine·2022
    Same author

    Undertaking a face-to-face objective structured clinical examination for medical students during the COVID-19 pandemic.

    Irish journal of psychological medicine·2022
    Same author

    Inflammatory Arthritis Post Covid-19 Infection.

    Irish medical journal·2022
    Same author

    Dermatomyositis with calcinosis universalis.

    QJM : monthly journal of the Association of Physicians·2021
    Same author

    Delirium occurrence in older Irish adults admitted to an acute medical hospital: a prospective cohort study.

    Irish journal of psychological medicine·2021
    Same journal

    Your Heart Beats Next To Mine: Daily Physiological Synchrony Among Black And White ADRD Caregiver-Care Recipient Dyads.

    Biological psychology·2026
    Same journal

    Stimulus arousal level and savoring:an electrocortical investigation.

    Biological psychology·2026
    Same journal

    Neural Response to Reward and Pathological Personality Dimensions.

    Biological psychology·2026
    Same journal

    Early automatic and late lateralised top-down mechanisms for 3D perception.

    Biological psychology·2026
    Same journal

    Preliminary evidence for context-dependent modulation of interoceptive signals in social evaluation.

    Biological psychology·2026
    Same journal

    How Do We Remember the Future? A Systematic Review of ERP Components in Focal and Nonfocal Prospective Memory Tasks.

    Biological psychology·2026
    See all related articles

    This study investigated how visual (orthographic) and sound (phonological) word features interact during reading. Conflicting cues between visual appearance and rhyming significantly slowed down word matching tasks.

    Area of Science:

    • Cognitive Psychology
    • Neuroscience
    • Psycholinguistics

    Background:

    • Understanding word processing involves examining the interplay between visual (orthographic) and auditory (phonological) information.
    • Previous research suggests that both visual and phonological features influence how individuals recognize and process written words.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate the interaction between orthographic and phonological information during word pair matching.
    • To determine the processing locus of these interactions using behavioral and neurophysiological measures.

    Main Methods:

    • Two experiments were conducted using word pairs with varying degrees of orthographic and phonological similarity.
    • Experiment 1 measured reaction times (RTs) for visual and rhyme matching tasks.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Experiment 2 recorded event-related brain potentials (ERPs) to identify neural correlates of the observed effects.
  • Main Results:

    • Reaction times were significantly increased when orthographic and phonological cues conflicted during rhyme matching.
    • Visual matching tasks showed faster overall RTs, with visually similar pairs eliciting rapid responses.
    • Event-related potentials indicated that the interaction between orthographic and phonological codes occurs at the stimulus comparison stage, potentially affecting response selection.

    Conclusions:

    • The findings suggest that orthographic and phonological processing interact early in word recognition, at least by the stimulus comparison stage.
    • Conflicts between visual and sound-based word information can lead to processing delays and impact response selection.
    • These results contribute to understanding various models of word processing and reading.