Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Experiment Videos

MBD: meanings and misconceptions.

H G Taylor

    Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology
    |September 1, 1983
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    The term Minimal Brain Dysfunction (MBD) is problematic for diagnosing childhood disabilities. This paper clarifies misconceptions, advocating for better terminology to improve communication about learning and behavioral issues.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Discordance in neonatal risk factors and early childhood outcomes of very low birth weight (<1.5 kg) twins.

    Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association·2012
    Same author

    The Childhood Adenotonsillectomy Trial (CHAT): rationale, design, and challenges of a randomized controlled trial evaluating a standard surgical procedure in a pediatric population.

    Sleep·2011
    Same author

    Japanese B encephalitis; clinical observations in an outbreak on Okinawa Shima.

    Archives of neurology and psychiatry·2010
    Same author

    Further evidence of pleiotropy influencing speech and language: analysis of the DYX8 region.

    Human heredity·2007
    Same author

    Utility of kindergarten teacher judgments in identifying early learning problems.

    Journal of learning disabilities·2004
    Same author

    Follow-up of children with early expressive phonology disorders.

    Journal of learning disabilities·2004
    Same journal

    Relative accuracy of three automated systems for neuropsychological interpretation.

    Journal of clinical neuropsychology·1984
    Same journal

    Florida Kindergarten Screening Battery.

    Journal of clinical neuropsychology·1984
    Same journal

    Luria left in the lurch: unfulfilled promises are not valid tests.

    Journal of clinical neuropsychology·1984
    Same journal

    Methodological considerations in the use of attribute variables in neuropsychological research.

    Journal of clinical neuropsychology·1984
    Same journal

    Cued recall in amnesia.

    Journal of clinical neuropsychology·1984
    Same journal

    Classification of dementia patients by a WAIS profile related to central cholinergic deficiencies.

    Journal of clinical neuropsychology·1984
    See all related articles
    JoVE
    x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
    ABOUT JoVE
    OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
    AUTHORS
    Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
    LIBRARIANS
    TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
    RESEARCH
    JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
    EDUCATION
    JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
    Terms & Conditions of Use
    Privacy Policy
    Policies

    Area of Science:

    • Child Psychology
    • Developmental Pediatrics
    • Neurodevelopmental Disorders

    Background:

    • The term Minimal Brain Dysfunction (MBD) is widely used but poorly understood in pediatric clinical services.
    • Significant debate and apprehension surround MBD, despite the reality of childhood disabilities it attempts to describe.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To clarify major misconceptions associated with the term Minimal Brain Dysfunction (MBD).
    • To review the essential features of the MBD concept for a more rational discussion.
    • To advocate for improved terminology in understanding and communicating about childhood learning and behavioral problems.

    Main Methods:

    • Conceptual analysis of the term Minimal Brain Dysfunction (MBD).
    • Review of the historical context and underlying traditions of the MBD concept.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Identification of misconceptions and limitations of the current terminology.

    • Main Results:

    • The term MBD creates false impressions and its underlying concept is unsatisfactory.
    • Continued use of the term MBD is objectionable due to its ambiguity and misleading nature.
    • The emphasis on biological factors within the MBD tradition is valuable for understanding developmental disorders.

    Conclusions:

    • Misconceptions surrounding MBD hinder effective communication and rational discussion.
    • Developing more appropriate terminology is crucial for accurately describing childhood disabilities.
    • Retaining the focus on biological factors while discarding problematic terminology will improve clinical understanding and communication.