Related Experiment Videos
Parents seeking help after cot death. How atypical is their experience?
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
|September 1, 1983
Summary
This study compared cot death cases with epidemiological data. Despite some social class bias, infant data and histories were similar, supporting the survey
Area of Science:
- Pediatrics
- Epidemiology
- Public Health
Background:
- Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS), or cot death, remains a significant concern in infant mortality.
- Epidemiological studies are crucial for understanding SIDS risk factors and trends.
- A survey by the Foundation for the Study of Infant Deaths offers a continuous data source.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare data from a cot death survey with formal epidemiological studies.
- To assess the reliability and utility of the ongoing cot death survey.
- To evaluate the therapeutic value of the survey for parents.
Main Methods:
- A survey of 241 cot death cases reported to the Foundation for the Study of Infant Deaths.
- Comparison of survey data with findings from established epidemiological studies.
- Analysis of demographic and infant history data, accounting for social class selection bias.
Main Results:
- Survey cases were predominantly from higher social classes, introducing selection bias.
- This bias affected data on maternal age and infant feeding practices.
- Infant data and histories from the survey showed strong similarity to other epidemiological studies.
Conclusions:
- The cot death survey provides valuable epidemiological monitoring.
- Despite selection bias, the survey's infant data is comparable to other studies.
- The survey offers therapeutic benefits to parents and should be continued.