Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Photographic superimposition.

R B Dorion

    Journal of Forensic Sciences
    |July 1, 1983
    PubMed
    Summary

    Photographic superimposition aids forensic identification by comparing antemortem photos to skull images. Careful technique is crucial to avoid misidentification in forensic medicine and dentistry.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Disasters big and small.

    Journal (Canadian Dental Association)·1990
    Same author

    Transillumination in bite mark evidence.

    Journal of forensic sciences·1987
    Same author

    Preservation and fixation of skin for ulterior scientific evaluation and courtroom presentation.

    Journal (Canadian Dental Association)·1984
    Same author

    Bite mark evidence.

    Journal (Canadian Dental Association)·1982
    Same author

    Dentures in identification of corpses.

    Ontario dentist·1981
    Same author

    Denture making: a public service.

    Ontario dentist·1980

    Area of Science:

    • Forensic Science
    • Forensic Dentistry
    • Forensic Medicine

    Background:

    • Photographic superimposition is a technique used in forensic medicine and dentistry.
    • This method involves comparing antemortem (before death) photographs with images of a skull.

    Observation:

    • The study details the technical aspects of photographic superimposition.
    • Potential challenges and sources of error in the procedure are discussed.

    Findings:

    • Two case studies are presented to illustrate the application of this technique.
    • These cases highlight both the correct utilization and the potential misuse of photographic superimposition for positive identification.

    Implications:

    • Accurate application of photographic superimposition is vital for reliable identification in forensic cases.
    • Understanding the limitations and potential pitfalls is essential to prevent erroneous conclusions in forensic investigations.