Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Disasters big and small.

R B Dorion1

  • 1Laboratoire de Médecine Legale, Ministry of Public Security of Quebec, Montreal, Canada.

Journal (Canadian Dental Association)
|July 1, 1990
PubMed
Summary

Forensic dentistry aids disaster victim identification by examining dental records. This review covers historical methods, common errors, and statistical challenges in disaster management.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Transillumination in bite mark evidence.

Journal of forensic sciences·1987
Same author

Preservation and fixation of skin for ulterior scientific evaluation and courtroom presentation.

Journal (Canadian Dental Association)·1984
Same author

Photographic superimposition.

Journal of forensic sciences·1983
Same author

Bite mark evidence.

Journal (Canadian Dental Association)·1982
Same author

Dentures in identification of corpses.

Ontario dentist·1981
Same author

Denture making: a public service.

Ontario dentist·1980

Area of Science:

  • Forensic Dentistry
  • Disaster Victim Identification

Background:

  • Disaster management relies on accurate identification of victims.
  • Forensic dentistry plays a crucial role in identifying individuals in mass casualty incidents.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the history and methodologies of disaster management in forensic dentistry.
  • To identify common problems, errors, and statistical considerations in the field.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of historical and current practices in forensic dental identification.
  • Analysis of case studies and statistical data related to disaster victim identification.

Main Results:

  • The history reveals evolving techniques in forensic dental identification.
  • Common errors include misidentification due to poor record-keeping and data analysis.

Conclusions:

  • Effective disaster management requires standardized protocols and rigorous statistical analysis in forensic dentistry.
  • Addressing challenges in misidentification is key to successful victim identification.

Related Experiment Videos