Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Consent, competency and ECT: a philosopher's comment.

H Lesser

    Journal of Medical Ethics
    |September 1, 1983
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Pregabalin relieves symptoms of painful diabetic neuropathy: a randomized controlled trial.

    Neurology·2004
    Same author

    Obligation and consent.

    Journal of medical ethics·1989
    Same author

    The performance of cultural-familial retardates on conservation tasks.

    The Journal of genetic psychology·1978
    Same author

    Problem-solving rigidity of children on perceptual tasks as a function of parental authoritarianism.

    The Journal of genetic psychology·1977
    Same author

    Replications and refinements.

    The Journal of genetic psychology·1975
    Same author

    Dogmatism, dogmatism factors, and liberalism-conservatism.

    Psychological reports·1974
    Same journal

    Assisted dying and autonomy as an end in itself: a response to Donaldson.

    Journal of medical ethics·2026
    Same journal

    Ethics briefing.

    Journal of medical ethics·2026
    Same journal

    Medical ethics and categorisation.

    Journal of medical ethics·2026
    Same journal

    Suspension or prioritisation? Exploring the ethics of age-based rationing in adult ADHD services.

    Journal of medical ethics·2026
    Same journal

    Ethics of not knowing who we are talking to in qualitative research.

    Journal of medical ethics·2026
    Same journal

    Suicide is not a public health issue and perhaps very few things should be.

    Journal of medical ethics·2026
    See all related articles

    Patient decision-making capacity and treatment refusal require nuanced definitions of competence and rationality. While irrational refusals may need overruling, proving irrationality in practice is challenging, favoring a presumption against coercion.

    Area of Science:

    • Medical Ethics
    • Healthcare Law
    • Patient Autonomy

    Background:

    • The abstract discusses the complexities surrounding patient competence and rationality in medical decision-making.
    • It addresses the ethical and practical challenges of overruling a patient's decision to refuse treatment, even when it appears beneficial.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To propose modifications to the definitions of 'competence' and 'rationality' in medical contexts.
    • To explore the practical difficulties in assessing patient rationality and the benefits of treatment.
    • To advocate for a patient-centered approach that prioritizes autonomy unless clear irrationality is proven.

    Main Methods:

    • This is a commentary and does not present empirical data.
    • It involves a critical analysis of existing concepts of competence and rationality.
    Keywords:
    Analytical ApproachMental Health TherapiesPhilosophical ApproachProfessional Patient Relationship

    Related Experiment Videos

  • It considers practical factors influencing treatment refusal decisions in clinical settings.

    • Main Results:

    • Overruling competent but irrational treatment refusals is ethically supported but practically difficult, except in life-threatening situations or refusal of basic necessities.
    • Factors such as alternative treatments, possibility of persuasion, legal obligations, and resource availability complicate clinical decisions.
    • A strong presumption against coercion is recommended, with patients considered rational until proven otherwise.

    Conclusions:

    • Definitions of competence and rationality may need refinement to better address complex patient decisions.
    • Clinical practice should carefully balance patient autonomy with the need to ensure well-being, erring on the side of respecting patient choice.
    • The principle of 'rational until proved irrational' should guide clinical interactions to uphold patient rights and minimize coercion.