Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Clinical evaluation of olfaction.

W S Cain, J Gent, F A Catalanotto

    American Journal of Otolaryngology
    |July 1, 1983
    PubMed
    Summary

    Quantitative olfactory tests effectively assessed smell function in patients with chemosensory issues. These tests distinguished between patients and controls, categorizing olfactory function from normal to anosmia.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Effectiveness of dinoprostone gel, misoprostol vaginal insert and dinoprostone vaginal insert for induction of labour in twin pregnancies.

    European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology·2023
    Same author

    Comparison of international guidelines on the management of twin pregnancy.

    European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology·2023
    Same author

    Nature of perceived effort and fatigue.

    Journal of motor behavior·2013
    Same author

    Constant effort during static and dynamic muscular exercise.

    Journal of motor behavior·2013
    Same author

    Stress reduction at the worksite: an evaluation of two methods.

    American journal of health promotion : AJHP·2011
    Same author

    Ventilation rates and health: multidisciplinary review of the scientific literature.

    Indoor air·2011

    Area of Science:

    • Neuroscience
    • Otorhinolaryngology
    • Sensory Science

    Background:

    • Chemosensory complaints significantly impact quality of life.
    • Accurate quantitative assessment of olfactory function is crucial for diagnosis and management.
    • Existing methods may not fully capture the nuances of olfactory deficits.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To evaluate the efficacy of odor identification and odor threshold tests in quantifying olfactory function.
    • To determine if these tests can differentiate between patients with chemosensory complaints and healthy controls.
    • To establish a standardized scoring system for classifying olfactory dysfunction.

    Main Methods:

    • Utilized an odor threshold test with ascending concentrations of butanol in a two-alternative forced-choice procedure.
    • Employed an odor identification test with common and pungent odors, incorporating odor names and corrective feedback to address word-finding difficulties.
    • Compared test results between patients presenting with chemosensory complaints and a control group.

    Main Results:

    • Both the odor identification and odor threshold tests provided satisfactory quantitative data on olfactory function.
    • Each test demonstrated a clear ability to distinguish between patient and control groups.
    • A combined scoring system effectively categorized olfactory function into five distinct levels: normal osmesis, mild hyposmia, moderate hyposmia, severe hyposmia, and anosmia.

    Conclusions:

    • Odor identification and threshold tests are valuable quantitative tools for assessing olfactory function in individuals with chemosensory complaints.
    • These tests offer a reliable method for differentiating olfactory deficits and classifying the severity of dysfunction.
    • The developed scoring system provides a standardized framework for reporting olfactory status.

    Related Experiment Videos