Skeletal stabilization with a multiplane external fixation device. Biomechanical evaluation and finite element model

The general question of the influence of fracture stability on bone healing remains unanswered and has important bearing on fracture stabilization by external fixation. The stiffness of an external fixator is dependent on pin placement and frame orientation. These parameters are under the surgeon's control, within limits set by soft tissue injury and fixator design. Fixator configuration parameters include common fragment pin separation, common fragment pin angle, common fragment pin number, effective pin length, use of transfixing pins versus half-pins, and use of two versus three connecting rods. Each configuration parameter was varied independently under compressive, bending, and torsional load to determine the influence of that parameter on fracture stability under such loads. The interaction between these configuration parameters is complex. In general terms, fracture site stability may be increased by increasing common fragment pin separation, placing common fragment pins orthogonal to one another, increasing common fragment pin number, decreasing effective pin length, using transfixing rather than half-pins, and using as many connecting rods as possible. The difference between fracture site stability attainable with transfixing pins and with half-pins may be minimal if implementation of the other parameters combined with half-pins is optimized.