Orientation selectivity and the spatial distribution of enhancement and suppression in receptive fields of cat...

The relationship between orientation selectivity and spatial receptive field organization was analyzed. Receptive field maps were made with a dual stimulus technique where an optimally oriented activation slit was presented in the most responsive region to produce activity against which the effect of a test spot in various positions was determined. Both simple and complex cells had receptive fields which were subdivided into adjacent elongated and antagonistic subregions. When the two stimuli were presented in phase (both ON or OFF simultaneously) the fields had a central enhancement region with a strong suppression flank on one or both sides. Optimal slit orientation was related to the location of the suppression flank relative to the location of the central enhancement region, and the degree of orientation selectivity to the shape of the subregions and the distance between them. Estimated orientation tuning curves calculated from the receptive field maps gave satisfactory first approximations to experimental curves. The relative contribution of enhancement and suppression to orientation selectivity was studied by presenting a test slit in different orientations in phase with an optimally oriented activation slit. The orientation selectivity was produced almost exclusively by the flank suppression indicating that orientation selectivity is produced by inhibitory input. The flank suppression lacked any specific orientation selectivity, and it occurred only when both the central region and the flanks were activated in phase. Orientation selectivity in both simple and complex cells is explained by a receptive field organization where the cells have input from partially overlapping excitatory and inhibitory fields which have their centers slightly displaced from each other.