Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A comparison of two methods for calculating expected mortality.

A J Hartz, E E Giefer, R G Hoffmann

    Statistics in Medicine
    |July 1, 1983
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Evaluating pediatric psychology consultation services in a medical setting: An example.

    Journal of clinical psychology in medical settings·2013
    Same author

    Caregivers of adults with cancer: Multidimensional correlates of psychological distress.

    Journal of clinical psychology in medical settings·2013
    Same author

    Acinetobacter, Aeromonas and Trichococcus populations dominate the microbial community within urban sewer infrastructure.

    Environmental microbiology·2012
    Same author

    Comparison of type I, type III and type VI collagen binding assays in diagnosis of von Willebrand disease.

    Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH·2012
    Same author

    Absent collagen binding in a VWF A3 domain mutant: utility of the VWF:CB in diagnosis of VWD.

    Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH·2010
    Same author

    Screening for glaucoma with stereo disc photography.

    Journal of glaucoma·2009
    Same journal

    Interpretable Bayesian Modeling for Multireader Multicase Studies: Addressing Overdispersion and Limited Sample Size in Diagnostic Enhancement Evaluation.

    Statistics in medicine·2026
    Same journal

    Adaptive Sequential Multiple Hypotheses Testing for Concomitant Vaccine Safety Surveillance.

    Statistics in medicine·2026
    Same journal

    Novel Distance Regression for Repeated Outcomes With Missing Data: Applications to Longitudinal and Crossover Studies of Microbiome Beta-Diversity.

    Statistics in medicine·2026
    Same journal

    Optimal Weighted Tests for Replication Studies and the 'Two-Trials Rule' With Multiple Hypotheses.

    Statistics in medicine·2026
    Same journal

    Identifiable Copula-Double-Cox Models: A Fully Parametric Framework for Dependent Right-Censored Survival Data.

    Statistics in medicine·2026
    Same journal

    Moving From Individualized Risk-Based Prevention to Benefit-Based Prevention: Estimating Individualized Life-Years Gained From Prevention Services as a Basis for Eligibility.

    Statistics in medicine·2026
    See all related articles

    This study introduces a novel method for estimating expected mortality in survival studies, correcting biases found in traditional person-years calculations. The new approach offers a more accurate variance for observed mortality, improving statistical reliability in health research.

    Area of Science:

    • Epidemiology
    • Biostatistics
    • Survival Analysis

    Background:

    • Person-years survival statistics are widely used in mortality studies.
    • Current methods for calculating expected mortality using person-years and standard death rates are statistically flawed.
    • Existing models may provide biased estimates and inflated variance for observed mortality.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To derive a new, statistically justified method for estimating expected mortality.
    • To address the limitations and biases inherent in the traditional person-years method.
    • To provide a more accurate estimation of variance for observed mortality in survival studies.

    Main Methods:

    • Developed a new statistical model for expected mortality estimation.
    • The model assumes continuous contribution to expected mortality from study entry to end, irrespective of individual survival outcome.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Derived a new variance calculation for observed mortality under the proposed model.

    • Main Results:

    • The proposed model demonstrates that the traditional person-years method yields a biased estimate of expected mortality.
    • The new method provides a statistically sound basis for calculating expected mortality.
    • The variance of observed mortality under the new model is substantially lower than that of the person-years method.

    Conclusions:

    • The traditional person-years method for calculating expected mortality is not statistically justifiable.
    • A new model offers a more accurate and less biased estimation of expected mortality.
    • The revised variance calculation improves the precision of mortality studies.