Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Factors influencing bone scan quality.

F G Adams, A W Shirley

    European Journal of Nuclear Medicine
    |January 1, 1983
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    This study presents a subjective method for assessing bone scan quality. Factors like obesity, age, sex, and scan abnormality weakly influence the results.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    The prognostic significance of visible infarction on computed tomography following lacunar stroke: results of a long-term follow-up study.

    Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging·2005
    Same author

    The role of spiral computed tomography and D-dimer in pulmonary embolism.

    Scottish medical journal·2001
    Same author

    Vertebral artery dissection diagnosed by non-invasive magnetic resonance imaging.

    Scottish medical journal·2000
    Same author

    Prognostic value of single-photon emission tomography in acute ischaemic stroke.

    European journal of nuclear medicine·1997
    Same author

    A pilot study of streptokinase for acute cerebral infarction.

    QJM : monthly journal of the Association of Physicians·1995
    Same author

    Poor accuracy of stroke scoring systems for differential clinical diagnosis of intracranial haemorrhage and infarction.

    Lancet (London, England)·1994
    Same journal

    [Not Available].

    European journal of nuclear medicine·2016
    Same journal

    A Window on Latin America.

    European journal of nuclear medicine·2016
    Same journal

    Erratum: Eur J Nucl Med (1999) 26: 686-692.

    European journal of nuclear medicine·2016
    Same journal

    Nuclear medicine in the next decade.

    European journal of nuclear medicine·2014
    Same journal

    Erratum: Impact of attenuation correction on the accuracy of FDG-PET in patients with abdominal tumors: a free-response ROC analysis.

    European journal of nuclear medicine·2014
    Same journal

    (99m)Tc(V)DMSA quantitatively predicts (188)Re(V)DMSA distribution in patients with prostate cancer metastatic to bone.

    European journal of nuclear medicine·2014
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Radiology
    • Medical Imaging

    Background:

    • Bone scans are crucial diagnostic tools.
    • Assessing bone scan quality is essential for accurate interpretation.
    • Subjective assessment methods require validation.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To describe a reliable subjective method for bone scan quality assessment.
    • To identify variables influencing bone scan quality.

    Main Methods:

    • Regression analysis was used.
    • Factor analysis was applied.
    • Numerous variables potentially affecting scan quality were analyzed.

    Main Results:

    • Obesity was identified as a significant factor.
    • Age was found to be a significant factor.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Sex was identified as a significant factor.
  • Scan abnormality was a significant factor.
  • All identified factors demonstrated a weak influence on overall scan quality.

    • Conclusions:

    • A reliable subjective method for assessing bone scan quality has been established.
    • Obesity, age, sex, and scan abnormality are statistically significant, albeit weak, predictors of bone scan quality.