Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Rights and responsibilities in the accreditation process.

F L Horvath

    Journal of Allied Health
    |November 1, 1983
    PubMed
    Summary

    This article examines institutional rights and responsibilities in accreditation, highlighting how standards can infringe on autonomy. It calls for collaboration to create more realistic accreditation standards for allied health education.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Commentary: the crisis in education.

    Journal of allied health·1987
    Same author

    The crisis in education.

    Journal (American Medical Record Association)·1986
    Same author

    Clinical and serologic study of four smallpox vaccines comparing variations of dose and route of administration. Basic study and laboratory standardization.

    The Journal of infectious diseases·1977
    Same author

    Letter: Incidence of goiter in an elementary school population.

    The Journal of pediatrics·1975
    Same author

    Deep thrombophlebitis associated with acute osteomyelitis.

    The Journal of pediatrics·1971
    Same author

    Acute hemangioma-like lesions associated with ECHO viral infections.

    Pediatrics·1969

    Area of Science:

    • Allied Health Education
    • Accreditation Processes
    • Healthcare Administration

    Background:

    • The article addresses the Committee on Allied Health Education and Accreditation (CAHEA) meeting in October 1981.
    • It focuses on the rights and responsibilities within the accreditation framework from an institutional viewpoint.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To analyze the legal, philosophical, and practical dimensions of institutional rights and responsibilities in health accreditation.
    • To identify instances where accreditation standards may overstep institutional boundaries.

    Main Methods:

    • Review of CAHEA's Essentials and Guidelines.
    • Analysis of accreditation processes from the perspective of educational institutions.

    Main Results:

    • Accreditation agencies' standards can unintentionally infringe upon the prerogatives of educational institutions.
    • A disconnect exists between agency-imposed standards and institutional autonomy.

    Conclusions:

    • There is a need for greater collaboration between institutions, allied health professions, and accrediting bodies.
    • Accreditation standards should be re-evaluated to be more realistic and accommodate institutional needs.

    Related Experiment Videos