Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Recovery at short intervals between masking flashes.

E Tenkink

    Vision Research
    |January 1, 1983
    PubMed
    Summary

    Visual masking recovery follows different rules based on target-mask intervals (t1). Shorter intervals reveal a peak recovery at 60ms and a U-shaped performance curve, suggesting early visual suppression.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Car driver behavior at flashing light railroad grade crossings.

    Accident; analysis and prevention·1990
    Same author

    Considerations on speed selection and risk homeostasis in driving.

    Accident; analysis and prevention·1988
    Same author

    The intervals at which homogeneous flashes recover masked targets.

    Perception & psychophysics·1981
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Visual perception
    • Psychophysics
    • Cognitive neuroscience

    Background:

    • Masking phenomena in visual perception, where a target is obscured by a mask, are crucial for understanding visual processing.
    • Previous research indicated differing recovery rules for target-mask intervals (t1) above and below 60 milliseconds.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To extend previous findings on visual masking recovery to shorter target-mask intervals (t1).
    • To confirm and elaborate on the rules governing visual masking recovery across a wider range of t1.

    Main Methods:

    • Experimental manipulation of target-mask intervals (t1) and target-blank intervals (t2).
    • Measurement of correct performance in a visual masking task.
    • Extension of prior experimental parameters to include shorter t1 values.

    Main Results:

    • Recovery of a masked target (T + M) by a homogeneous flash (B) was confirmed to follow different rules at t1 < 60 msec compared to t1 > 60 msec.
    • Performance recovery peaked at a constant target-blank interval (t2) of 60 msec for t1 between 20 msec and 60 msec.
    • A U-shaped performance curve was observed when the target-blank interval (t2) exceeded 120 msec.

    Conclusions:

    • The findings confirm and extend previous research on visual masking recovery, particularly at shorter target-mask intervals.
    • Two theoretical explanations are proposed, both assuming that the blank flash (B) suppresses target (T) and mask (M) activity early in the visual system.

    Related Experiment Videos