Related Experiment Videos
Persistent discrepancy in international diagnostic practice since 1970.
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
|December 1, 1983
Summary
International Classification of Diseases (ICD) adherence varies globally, with diagnostic discrepancies persisting. Increased non-psychotic admissions suggest stigma avoidance, highlighting the need for consistent ICD use and training.
Area of Science:
- Psychiatry and Mental Health Statistics
- International Health Classification Systems
Background:
- Analysis of national admission statistics from seven WHO member countries since 1970.
- Examination of adherence to the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) 8th revision and its subsequent updates.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the practical application and acceptance of specific ICD-8 diagnostic categories across different countries.
- To identify trends in diagnostic distribution and understand factors influencing classification choices.
- To evaluate the impact of local diagnostic systems on international standardization efforts.
Main Methods:
- Comparative analysis of national psychiatric admission data.
- Review of adherence rates to ICD categories in practice versus official adoption.
- Identification of trends in diagnostic terminology and category usage.
Main Results:
- Limited adherence to ICD-8 categories in practice, with low acceptance of new categories like 'Other psychosis' (298) and specific schizophrenia subgroups.
- Persistent diagnostic discrepancies, notably broad definitions of schizophrenia in the USA and depressive illness in England.
- A significant rise in non-psychotic admissions coinciding with a decline in hospital populations, suggesting avoidance of 'psychosis' stigma.
Conclusions:
- Continued challenges in achieving consistent international diagnostic classification despite ICD adoption.
- The need for improved training on WHO diagnostic guidelines and terminology.
- Local diagnostic systems (e.g., DSM-III) may hinder international standardization and consensus.